Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2015
Endorectal ultrasonography, strain elastography and MRI differentiation of rectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Waage J E R, Leh S, Røsler C, Pfeffer F, Bach S P, Havre R F, Haldorsen I S, Ødegaard S, Baatrup G
Аннотация
AIM: Strain elastography is a method for recording tissue hardness. Strain in different areas may be compared using strain ratio (SR). The aims of this study were to validate a previously proposed SR cut-off value of 1.25 for differentiating adenocarcinomas from adenomas and to compare the performance of endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS), strain elastography and MRI in the same patients.
METHOD: A prospective evaluation of 120 consecutive patients with rectal neoplasia, using a predetermined elastography strain ratio cut-off value, was performed to differentiate adenomas from adenocarcinomas. ERUS and MRI were performed according to standard routine at Haukeland University Hospital, defining T0 as adenomas and T1-T4 as adenocarcinomas. Subsequent histopathology was used as the reference standard.
RESULTS: Histopathological evaluation revealed 21 adenomas and 99 adenocarcinomas. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (with 95% CI) were as follows: ERUS: 0.96 (0.90-0.99), 0.62 (0.40-0.80) and 0.90 (0.83-0.94); elastography SR: 0.96 (0.90-0.99), 0.86 (0.66-0.96) and 0.94 (0.88-0.97); and MRI: 0.99 (0.94-1.00), 0.07 (0.00-0.31) and 0.87 (0.80-0.93).
CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the elastography SR assessment accurately differentiates sessile adenomas from adenocarcinomas. SR assessment has a superior ability to differentiate adenomas and adenocarcinomas when compared with ERUS and MRI. MRI examination seems unable to recognize adenomas and should be interpreted with care when early-stage rectal neoplasia is suspected.
METHOD: A prospective evaluation of 120 consecutive patients with rectal neoplasia, using a predetermined elastography strain ratio cut-off value, was performed to differentiate adenomas from adenocarcinomas. ERUS and MRI were performed according to standard routine at Haukeland University Hospital, defining T0 as adenomas and T1-T4 as adenocarcinomas. Subsequent histopathology was used as the reference standard.
RESULTS: Histopathological evaluation revealed 21 adenomas and 99 adenocarcinomas. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (with 95% CI) were as follows: ERUS: 0.96 (0.90-0.99), 0.62 (0.40-0.80) and 0.90 (0.83-0.94); elastography SR: 0.96 (0.90-0.99), 0.86 (0.66-0.96) and 0.94 (0.88-0.97); and MRI: 0.99 (0.94-1.00), 0.07 (0.00-0.31) and 0.87 (0.80-0.93).
CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the elastography SR assessment accurately differentiates sessile adenomas from adenocarcinomas. SR assessment has a superior ability to differentiate adenomas and adenocarcinomas when compared with ERUS and MRI. MRI examination seems unable to recognize adenomas and should be interpreted with care when early-stage rectal neoplasia is suspected.