Translational vision science & technology · 2025
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Detection of LASIK Using Corneal Optical Coherence Tomography Maps.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hong Jiachi, Nanji Afshan A, Stutzman Richard D, Chamberlain Winston D, Song Xubo, Huang David, Li Yan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To train and validate a convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect the history of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgeries using corneal optical coherence tomography (OCT) maps.
METHODS: Five corneal OCT maps (pachymetry, epithelial thickness, posterior mean curvature, anterior axial power, and anterior stroma reflectance) were utilized as the input of a lightweight CNN model. OCT scans of healthy volunteers and patients who had undergone myopic or hyperopic LASIK were included. Repeated fivefold cross-validation was used to train and evaluate the proposed CNN. In addition, a separate group of post-LASIK participants, who were not included in the cross-validation, was used for out-of-sample testing to assess the CNN model performance.
RESULTS: In the cross-validation, the proposed CNN model achieved an overall balanced accuracy of 90.2% ± 3.6% with 93.5% ± 5.2% sensitivity and 97.8% ± 1.7% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in detecting myopic LASIK and 90.2% ± 5.8% sensitivity and 98.2% ± 1.9% AUC in identifying the hyperopic LASIK. In the out-of-sample test, all eyes were classified correctively.
CONCLUSIONS: The lightweight CNN model with corneal OCT maps provides a useful tool for detecting LASIK history.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Artificial intelligence-assisted OCT may offer better management for patients with LASIK history who need cataract surgeries.
METHODS: Five corneal OCT maps (pachymetry, epithelial thickness, posterior mean curvature, anterior axial power, and anterior stroma reflectance) were utilized as the input of a lightweight CNN model. OCT scans of healthy volunteers and patients who had undergone myopic or hyperopic LASIK were included. Repeated fivefold cross-validation was used to train and evaluate the proposed CNN. In addition, a separate group of post-LASIK participants, who were not included in the cross-validation, was used for out-of-sample testing to assess the CNN model performance.
RESULTS: In the cross-validation, the proposed CNN model achieved an overall balanced accuracy of 90.2% ± 3.6% with 93.5% ± 5.2% sensitivity and 97.8% ± 1.7% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in detecting myopic LASIK and 90.2% ± 5.8% sensitivity and 98.2% ± 1.9% AUC in identifying the hyperopic LASIK. In the out-of-sample test, all eyes were classified correctively.
CONCLUSIONS: The lightweight CNN model with corneal OCT maps provides a useful tool for detecting LASIK history.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Artificial intelligence-assisted OCT may offer better management for patients with LASIK history who need cataract surgeries.