m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025

Clinical and economic burden among older adults with acromegaly in the United States.

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Quock Tiffany P, Chang Eunice, Das Ashis K, Speller Amanda, Tarbox Marian H, Rattana Stacy K, Paulson Ingrid E, Broder Michael S

Аннотация

Aim: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs between older adults with and without acromegaly. Materials & methods: Using 2017-2022 100% Medicare Research Identifiable Files, we identified beneficiaries (≥65 years) with prevalent cases of acromegaly. A randomly selected claim with an acromegaly diagnosis was the index date. Beneficiaries were required to have continuous enrollment in Medicare fee-for-service and Part D for the 1-year post-index period (observation period). Beneficiaries with acromegaly were matched 1:1 (age, sex, race, US geographic region) to acromegaly-free beneficiaries (reference group). The beneficiaries in the reference group were assigned the same index date as their matched beneficiary with acromegaly and met the same enrollment criteria. Outcomes of interest, measured during the observation period, included all-cause and acromegaly-related HCRU and costs (adjusted to 2022 US dollars). Results: We identified 3491 beneficiaries with acromegaly and 3491 without acromegaly. The mean age was 73.1 years and the majority of beneficiaries were female and non-Hispanic White. Beneficiaries with acromegaly had more HCRU than those without acromegaly, including a greater proportion with hospitalizations (27.6 vs 14.9%), ED visits (31.8 vs 22.8%), use of skilled nursing facility care (7.3 vs 3.5%) and home health agency visits (18.1 vs 8.4%) (p < 0.001 for all). Total all-cause healthcare costs were higher among beneficiaries with acromegaly versus those without acromegaly ($45,830 vs $18,922, p < 0.001). The majority of beneficiaries with acromegaly (69.6%) did not have evidence of acromegaly treatment. Conclusion: Medicare beneficiaries with acromegaly have substantial HCRU and costs compared with controls without acromegaly; this indicates a high burden of illness which may be lessened by new and effective therapeutic options for those with acromegaly.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты