MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/iju5.12705

Медицинская библиотека · IJU case reports · 2024

A case of Legionella pneumonia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Nukaya Takuhisa, Ishikawa Kiyohito, Takahara Kiyoshi, Takenaka Masashi, Zennami Kenji, Ichino Manabu, Sasaki Hitomi, Sumitomo Makoto, Shiroki Ryoichi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative Legionella pneumonia is very rare.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 71-year-old male patient with prostate cancer (cT2bN0M0) underwent a robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. On the 5th postoperative day, the patient developed chills and a fever of 39.2°C. Chest radiography revealed decreased permeability in the right middle lung field, leading to the diagnosis of postoperative pneumonia. Antimicrobial therapy was initiated immediately. Blood tests on postoperative day 10 revealed mild liver function abnormalities, electrolyte abnormalities, and a markedly elevated inflammatory response. Legionella pneumonia was suspected based on blood sample results and systemic symptoms, such as diarrhea and nausea. Furthermore, Legionella antigens were detected in the patient's urine, prompting further administration of levofloxacin. The patient's subsequent clinical course was favorable.

CONCLUSION

When bacterial pneumonia fails to respond to antimicrobial therapy and systemic symptoms develop, atypical pneumonia, caused by pathogens such as Legionella pneumophila, should be considered even in cases of postoperative pneumonia.

Для цитирования: Nukaya Takuhisa, Ishikawa Kiyohito, Takahara Kiyoshi, Takenaka Masashi, Zennami Kenji, Ichino Manabu, Sasaki Hitomi, Sumitomo Makoto, Shiroki Ryoichi. A case of Legionella pneumonia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.. IJU case reports. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12705.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.