L' Orthodontie francaise · 2025
[Improving medical data collection practices in a university hospital department of dentofacial orthopedics].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dol Gaëlle, Soulier-Peigue Delphine, François Olivier, Nicolas Emmanuel, Hennequin Martine
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Improving professional practice is a quality assurance process that aims to control practices by reference to evidence-based studies and academic standards. This study describes the method developed in a university hospital setting to improve the collection of clinical data in orthodontics.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Deming cycle method (PDCA) was used.
RESULTS: 1) "PLAN" phase: A literature search and two national and local surveys were conducted to describe clinical data collection practices in orthodontics; 2) "DO" phase: A list of indicators to characterize malocclusions and dysmorphoses, as well as their functional and aesthetic effects, was drawn up in a digital format, then used in the orthodontic department for five months; 3) "CHECK" phase: The use and limitations of this tool were analyzed; 4) "ACT" phase: The form for "Evaluation of Malocclusions and Dysmorphoses and their Aesthetics and Functionals Effects" was finalized and the procedures for its implementation were specified.
DISCUSSION: The EPIEF MaloDys tool allows us to identify the existence of malocclusions or dysmorphoses and their aesthetic and functional effects, but its implementation may encounter some resistance to change.
CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the harmonization of orthodontics clinical data for clinical, educational, and research purposes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Deming cycle method (PDCA) was used.
RESULTS: 1) "PLAN" phase: A literature search and two national and local surveys were conducted to describe clinical data collection practices in orthodontics; 2) "DO" phase: A list of indicators to characterize malocclusions and dysmorphoses, as well as their functional and aesthetic effects, was drawn up in a digital format, then used in the orthodontic department for five months; 3) "CHECK" phase: The use and limitations of this tool were analyzed; 4) "ACT" phase: The form for "Evaluation of Malocclusions and Dysmorphoses and their Aesthetics and Functionals Effects" was finalized and the procedures for its implementation were specified.
DISCUSSION: The EPIEF MaloDys tool allows us to identify the existence of malocclusions or dysmorphoses and their aesthetic and functional effects, but its implementation may encounter some resistance to change.
CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the harmonization of orthodontics clinical data for clinical, educational, and research purposes.