Journal of the neurological sciences · 2026
Instrumental assessment of movement series reflects scored improvement of patients with Parkinson's disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Müller Thomas, Öhm Gabi, Borowka Raphaela, Gäde Gunnar, Haas Thomas, Lütge Sven, Milenkovic Ana, Rothe Hartmut, von Engelhardt Heike, Ulmer Miriam, Möhr Jan-Dominique
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Performance of Parkinson's Disease Multidisciplinary Complex Therapy in specialized units is quite common in Germany. Data on the benefit of this hospitalisation approach in conjunction with standardised performance of instrumental tests are rare.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcome in 271 consecutively referred patients with Parkinson's disease.
METHODS: Disease severity was scored in combination with execution of standardised instrumental procedures in after admission and before discharge.
RESULTS: Rating scale scores and test outcomes of simple, repetitive and complex movement series execution improved. There were high correlation coefficients between the applied various evaluations at the two assessment moments. Computed differences of the instrumental test results between both valuation timepoints were weakly associated to each other.
CONCLUSION: The used approach of combined subjective and objective evaluation mirrors the achieved benefit. This concept is suitable to convince payers on the positive effects of this kind of in-patient stays, which also reduces caregiver burden.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcome in 271 consecutively referred patients with Parkinson's disease.
METHODS: Disease severity was scored in combination with execution of standardised instrumental procedures in after admission and before discharge.
RESULTS: Rating scale scores and test outcomes of simple, repetitive and complex movement series execution improved. There were high correlation coefficients between the applied various evaluations at the two assessment moments. Computed differences of the instrumental test results between both valuation timepoints were weakly associated to each other.
CONCLUSION: The used approach of combined subjective and objective evaluation mirrors the achieved benefit. This concept is suitable to convince payers on the positive effects of this kind of in-patient stays, which also reduces caregiver burden.