MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.74145

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology international · 2010

Treatment of ruptured intracranial dissecting aneurysms in Hong Kong.

Wong George Kwok Chu, Tang Hoi Bun, Poon Wai Sang, Yu Simon Chun Ho

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Data suggests that hemorrhagic presentations occur in 20% of internal carotid artery dissections and 50% of vertebral artery dissections. A Finnish study has reported favorable outcomes in only 32% of patients. We aimed to review the epidemiology and management outcomes in a Chinese population.

METHODS

We reviewed the aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage registry of patients who presented with intracranial dissecting aneurysms at a neurosurgical center in Hong Kong over a five-year period.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients with intracranial dissecting aneurysms were identified, accounting for 8% of all spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Forty-eight percent of the patients identified were treated by main trunk occlusion and 39% were treated by embolization or stent-assisted embolization or stent alone. Thirteen percent were managed by craniotomy and trapping or wrapping. Favorable outcomes at six months were achieved in 67%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with intracranial dissecting aneurysms account for a significant proportion of the cases of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage in our population. Carefully selected endovascular and microsurgical treatments can lead to management outcomes similar to patients with saccular aneurysms.

Для цитирования: Wong George Kwok Chu, Tang Hoi Bun, Poon Wai Sang, Yu Simon Chun Ho. Treatment of ruptured intracranial dissecting aneurysms in Hong Kong.. Surgical neurology international. 2010. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.74145.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.