MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1557988308321675

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of men's health · 2008

Masculinity and the body: how African American and White men experience cancer screening exams involving the rectum.

Winterich Julie A, Quandt Sara A, Grzywacz Joseph G, Clark Peter E, Miller David P, Acuña Joshua, Arcury Thomas A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Past research on prostate and colorectal cancer disparities finds that barriers to screening, such as embarrassment and offensiveness, are often reported. Yet none of this literature investigates why. This study uses masculinity and health theory to examine how men experience two common screenings: digital rectal exams (DREs) and colonoscopies. In-depth interviews were conducted with 64 African American and White men from diverse backgrounds, aged 40 to 64, from North Carolina. Regardless of race or education, men experienced DREs more negatively than colonoscopies because penetration with a finger was associated with a gay sexual act. Some men disliked colonoscopies, however, because they associated any penetration as an affront to their masculinity. Because beliefs did not differ by race, future research should focus on structural issues to examine why disparities persist with prostate and colorectal cancer. Recommendations are provided for educational programs and physicians to improve men's experiences with exams that involve the rectum.

Для цитирования: Winterich Julie A, Quandt Sara A, Grzywacz Joseph G, Clark Peter E, Miller David P, Acuña Joshua, Arcury Thomas A. Masculinity and the body: how African American and White men experience cancer screening exams involving the rectum.. American journal of men's health. 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1557988308321675.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.