JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2021
Design and Preliminary Results of Sensing and Detection for an Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Swerdlow Charles D, Zhang Xusheng, Sawchuk Robert, Greenhut Saul, Grinberg Yanina, Liu Yuanzhen, Crozier Ian, O'Donnell David, Kotschet Emily, Haqqani Haris
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study reports the sensing and arrhythmia detection performance of a novel extravascular (EV) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in a first-in-human pilot study.
BACKGROUND: The EV ICD lead is implanted in the substernal space, resulting in novel sensing and detection challenges. It uses a programmable sensing profile with new or modified discrimination of oversensing and of ventricular tachycardia (VT) from supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).
METHODS: Electrograms were post-processed from induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) at implant to determine virtual detection times for each programmable sensitivity and the least-sensitive safe sensitivity setting. In ambulatory patients, programmed sensitivity provided at least a twofold safety margin for detecting induced VF. Noise discrimination was stress tested, and the effects of source, posture, and lead maturation were determined on electrogram amplitude. Telemetry Holter monitors were used to quantify undersensing and oversensing.
RESULTS: In 20 patients at implant, the least-sensitive safe sensitivity for VF detection ranged from 0.1 to 0.6 mV. Seventeen patients were followed up for a total of 16.6 patient-years. Electrogram amplitudes were stable over time, but there were significant differences among postures and sensing vectors. For the primary sensing vector, the weighted oversensing and undersensing rates were 1.03% and 0.40% respectively, on a beat-to-beat basis. Oversensing did not cause inappropriate therapy in patients with in situ leads. Oversensing discriminators withheld VF detection in 4 of 5 spontaneous, sustained oversensed episodes. SVT-VT discriminators correctly classified 93% of 128 sustained SVTs in monitor zones.
CONCLUSIONS: In the EV ICD pilot study, oversensing did not cause inappropriate therapy during ambulatory follow-up of stable leads.
BACKGROUND: The EV ICD lead is implanted in the substernal space, resulting in novel sensing and detection challenges. It uses a programmable sensing profile with new or modified discrimination of oversensing and of ventricular tachycardia (VT) from supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).
METHODS: Electrograms were post-processed from induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) at implant to determine virtual detection times for each programmable sensitivity and the least-sensitive safe sensitivity setting. In ambulatory patients, programmed sensitivity provided at least a twofold safety margin for detecting induced VF. Noise discrimination was stress tested, and the effects of source, posture, and lead maturation were determined on electrogram amplitude. Telemetry Holter monitors were used to quantify undersensing and oversensing.
RESULTS: In 20 patients at implant, the least-sensitive safe sensitivity for VF detection ranged from 0.1 to 0.6 mV. Seventeen patients were followed up for a total of 16.6 patient-years. Electrogram amplitudes were stable over time, but there were significant differences among postures and sensing vectors. For the primary sensing vector, the weighted oversensing and undersensing rates were 1.03% and 0.40% respectively, on a beat-to-beat basis. Oversensing did not cause inappropriate therapy in patients with in situ leads. Oversensing discriminators withheld VF detection in 4 of 5 spontaneous, sustained oversensed episodes. SVT-VT discriminators correctly classified 93% of 128 sustained SVTs in monitor zones.
CONCLUSIONS: In the EV ICD pilot study, oversensing did not cause inappropriate therapy during ambulatory follow-up of stable leads.