MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011000900020

Медицинская библиотека · Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2011

The effects of pneumoperitoneum and controlled ventilation on peritoneal lymphatic bacterial clearance: experimental results in rats.

Casaroli Armando Angelo, Mimica Lycia M J, Fontes Belchor, Rasslan Samir

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of pneumoperitoneum, both alone and in combination with controlled ventilation, on peritoneal lymphatic bacterial clearance using a rat bacterial peritonitis model.

METHOD: A total of 69 male Wistar rats were intraperitoneally inoculated with an Escherichia coli solution (10(9) colony-forming units (cfu)/mL) and divided into three groups of 23 animals each: A (control group), B (pneumoperitoneum under 5 mmHg of constant pressure), and C (endotracheal intubation, controlled ventilation, and pneumoperitoneum as in Group B). The animals were sacrificed after 30 min under these conditions, and blood, mediastinal ganglia, lungs, peritoneum, liver, and spleen cultures were performed.

RESULTS

Statistical analyses comparing the number of cfu/sample in each of the cultures showed that no differences existed between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, we concluded that pneumoperitoneum, either alone or in association with mechanical ventilation, did not modify the bacterial clearance through the diaphragmatic lymphatic system of the peritoneal cavity.

Для цитирования: Casaroli Armando Angelo, Mimica Lycia M J, Fontes Belchor, Rasslan Samir. The effects of pneumoperitoneum and controlled ventilation on peritoneal lymphatic bacterial clearance: experimental results in rats.. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2011. DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000900020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.