European journal of ophthalmology · 2024
Efficacy of ranibizumab and aflibercept on reducing maximum diameter of largest cyst in diabetic cystoid macular edema: MARMASIA study group.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tokuç Ecem Önder, Karabaş V Levent, Sevik Mehmet Orkun, Kaplan Fatih Bilgehan, Kutlutürk Karagöz Işıl, Kanar Hatice Selen, Yayla Uğur, Sönmez Ayşe Demirciler, Aykut Aslan, Limon Utku, Bozkurt Erdinç, Özsoy Saygın Işılay, Aydoğan Gezginaslan Tuğba, Erçalık Nimet Yeşim, Kumral Türkseven Esra, Aydın Öncü Özlem, Çelik Erkan, Başaran Emengen Ece, Özkaya Abdullah, Öncel Banu Açıkalın, Yenerel Nursal Melda, Şahin Özlem
Аннотация
PurposeThis study aimed to compare the effect of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and ranibizumab (IVR) on the maximal diameter of the largest intraretinal cyst (mdIRC), indicating chronicity in patients with diabetic cystoid macular edema (CME).MethodsThis retrospective, comparative study included a subgroup of patients from the MARMASIA Study with treatment-naïve diabetic CME who had IVA (IVA group) or IVR (IVR group) on a pro re nata regimen after a loading dose of 3-monthly injections and followed-up for 24 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR), central macular thickness (CMT, µm), and mdIRC (µm) and their changes during the study period in the IVA and IVR groups were compared.ResultsA total of 175 eyes (65 [37.1%] in IVA and 110 [62.9%] in IVR group) of 113 patients were included in the study analysis. Both groups had statistically significant improvements in BCVA and CMT during the follow-up (p < 0.05 for all), which were comparable between the groups at each time point. However, the mean reduction in mdIRCs was consistently and significantly higher in the IVA group compared to the IVR group at each follow-up examination (F[1, 3.52] = 6.93, p = 0.009).ConclusionIVA seems to have a greater impact in reducing cyst sizes than IVR in diabetic CME.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsMacular EdemaRetrospective StudiesIntravitreal InjectionsMaleDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsTomography, Optical CoherenceMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeFollow-Up StudiesAgedVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AFluorescein AngiographyMacula Lutea