MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/rcs.1706

Медицинская библиотека · The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2015

Robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) procedures in general surgery.

Alimoglu Orhan, Sagiroglu Julide, Atak Ibrahim, Kilic Ali, Eren Tunc, Caliskan Mujgan, Bas Gurhan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Robotics was introduced in clinical practice more than two decades ago, and it has gained remarkable popularity for a wide variety of laparoscopic procedures. We report our results of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) in the most commonly applied general surgical procedures.

METHOD: Ninety seven patients underwent RALS from 2009 to 2012. Indications for RALS were cholelithiasis, gastric carcinoma, splenic tumors, colorectal carcinoma, benign colorectal diseases, non-toxic nodular goiter and incisional hernia. Records of patients were analyzed for demographic features, intraoperative and postoperative complications and conversion to open surgery.

RESULTS

Forty six female and 51 male patients were operated and mean age was 58,4 (range: 25-88). Ninety three out of 97 procedures (96%) were completed robotically, 4 were converted to open surgery and there were 15 postoperative complications. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

Wide variety of procedures of general surgery can be managed safely and effectively by RALS. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Для цитирования: Alimoglu Orhan, Sagiroglu Julide, Atak Ibrahim, Kilic Ali, Eren Tunc, Caliskan Mujgan, Bas Gurhan. Robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) procedures in general surgery.. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS. 2015. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1706.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.