MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Dermatology online journal · 2020

A review of intralesional wart therapy.

Muse Mikél E, Stiff Katherine M, Glines Katelyn R, Cline Abigail, Feldman Steven R

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

New treatment options for warts include intralesional wart injection with agents such as vitamin D, measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine antigen, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) antigen, and candida antigen but there have been limited studies to compare their efficacies.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the efficacy and safety of injectable agents used for the treatment of warts.

METHODS

A PubMed search included terms "intralesional wart therapy," "wart injection" and "verruca injection." Articles reviewed were published over 10 years.

RESULTS

A total of 43 articles were reviewed; 30 covered studies with more than 10 participants and 13 were case reports, case series, and reviews. In comparison studies intralesional agents have equal or superior efficacy (66%-94.9%) compared to first-line salicylic acid or cryotherapy (65.5-76.5%). One advantage of intralesional injections is the rate of complete resolution of distant warts.

LIMITATIONS: Each study varied in their agents, treatment interval, and treatment dose, making comparisons difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

Intralesional wart injections are safe, affordable, and efficacious treatments for warts. Physicians should consider intralesional injections for patients with refractory warts, multiple warts, or warts in sensitive areas.

Для цитирования: Muse Mikél E, Stiff Katherine M, Glines Katelyn R, Cline Abigail, Feldman Steven R. A review of intralesional wart therapy.. Dermatology online journal. 2020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.