Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) · 2011
Multidisciplinary nutritional support for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a cost-benefit analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hagiwara Shotaro, Mori Tatsuya, Tuchiya Hayato, Sato Someyo, Higa Misato, Watahiki Mika, Hoshina Miho, Mochizuki Tomomi, Chiba Takiko, Miwa Akiyoshi, Kawachi Shoji
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the economic and clinical efficacy of a multidisciplinary nutritional support team (NST) for autologous stem cell transplantation.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cost-benefit analysis of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with and without NST intervention at a single institute. Patients (n = 120) had undergone 169 ASCTs, 67 before the commencement of NST intervention in September 2005 and 102 after September 2005. The conditioning regimens, prophylactic antibiotics, and supportive care were unchanged from 2001 through 2008. The duration of hospitalization, cost, and laboratory data were analyzed.
RESULTS: With NST intervention, the duration of total parenteral nutrition, absence of oral food intake, hospitalization, and therapeutic antibiotic usage were significantly shortened by 11.4, 9.7, 8.1, and 4.5 d, respectively. With NST intervention, the incidence of hepatic adverse events and hyperglycemia was low, and the total cost of hospitalization was significantly decreased by 403 600 yen (US $4484.40). Two cases of therapy-related death were recorded before September 2005. No therapy-related mortality was observed after commencement of NST intervention; however, the difference was not significant.
CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary NST intervention has a positive effect on cost decrease, and it may decrease the incidence of adverse events associated with ASCT and total parenteral nutrition.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cost-benefit analysis of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with and without NST intervention at a single institute. Patients (n = 120) had undergone 169 ASCTs, 67 before the commencement of NST intervention in September 2005 and 102 after September 2005. The conditioning regimens, prophylactic antibiotics, and supportive care were unchanged from 2001 through 2008. The duration of hospitalization, cost, and laboratory data were analyzed.
RESULTS: With NST intervention, the duration of total parenteral nutrition, absence of oral food intake, hospitalization, and therapeutic antibiotic usage were significantly shortened by 11.4, 9.7, 8.1, and 4.5 d, respectively. With NST intervention, the incidence of hepatic adverse events and hyperglycemia was low, and the total cost of hospitalization was significantly decreased by 403 600 yen (US $4484.40). Two cases of therapy-related death were recorded before September 2005. No therapy-related mortality was observed after commencement of NST intervention; however, the difference was not significant.
CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary NST intervention has a positive effect on cost decrease, and it may decrease the incidence of adverse events associated with ASCT and total parenteral nutrition.