Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2025
Quality, reliability, and content on social media about temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review.
Систематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mehta Vini, Negi Sapna, Jagtap Snehal Rajendra, Agrawal Mansi, Tripathy Snehasish, Mathur Ankita, Reche Amit
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the quality, reliability, and content of TMD-related social media posts across multiple platforms.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of three databases were conducted. TMD related content on social media sites were considered eligible. The extracted data was narratively synthesized.
RESULTS: Out of 254 studies, seven were included. YouTube was the most commonly assessed social media platform (n=5). Information created by amateurs encourages greater interaction than that of experts or news outlets. A majority videos and threads cover treatment choices. However, there is a noticeable absence of discussion on complications and prevention methods. Health professionals' videos scored better in quality and reliability than -professionals' videos.
CONCLUSION: There is a need for creating evidence-based, accessible, and engaging content on TMD on social media and consideration of implementing rigorous information verification methods to ensure that high-quality, expert-validated content is prioritized in search results.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of three databases were conducted. TMD related content on social media sites were considered eligible. The extracted data was narratively synthesized.
RESULTS: Out of 254 studies, seven were included. YouTube was the most commonly assessed social media platform (n=5). Information created by amateurs encourages greater interaction than that of experts or news outlets. A majority videos and threads cover treatment choices. However, there is a noticeable absence of discussion on complications and prevention methods. Health professionals' videos scored better in quality and reliability than -professionals' videos.
CONCLUSION: There is a need for creating evidence-based, accessible, and engaging content on TMD on social media and consideration of implementing rigorous information verification methods to ensure that high-quality, expert-validated content is prioritized in search results.