MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08869634.2025.2482271

Медицинская библиотека · Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2025

Quality, reliability, and content on social media about temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review.

Mehta Vini, Negi Sapna, Jagtap Snehal Rajendra, Agrawal Mansi, Tripathy Snehasish, Mathur Ankita, Reche Amit

Систематический обзорСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to assess the quality, reliability, and content of TMD-related social media posts across multiple platforms.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of three databases were conducted. TMD related content on social media sites were considered eligible. The extracted data was narratively synthesized.

RESULTS

Out of 254 studies, seven were included. YouTube was the most commonly assessed social media platform (n=5). Information created by amateurs encourages greater interaction than that of experts or news outlets. A majority videos and threads cover treatment choices. However, there is a noticeable absence of discussion on complications and prevention methods. Health professionals' videos scored better in quality and reliability than -professionals' videos.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for creating evidence-based, accessible, and engaging content on TMD on social media and consideration of implementing rigorous information verification methods to ensure that high-quality, expert-validated content is prioritized in search results.

Для цитирования: Mehta Vini, Negi Sapna, Jagtap Snehal Rajendra, Agrawal Mansi, Tripathy Snehasish, Mathur Ankita, Reche Amit. Quality, reliability, and content on social media about temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review.. Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice. 2025. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2025.2482271.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.