DOI 10.3390/tomography11030027
Deep Learning for Ultrasonographic Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Morphology.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders are a significant cause of orofacial pain. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been successfully applied to other imaging modalities but remains underexplored in ultrasonographic evaluations of TMJ.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to develop and validate an AI-driven method for the automatic and reproducible measurement of TMJ space width from ultrasonographic images.
METHODS
A total of 142 TMJ ultrasonographic images were segmented into three anatomical components: the mandibular condyle, joint space, and glenoid fossa. State-of-the-art architectures were tested, and the best-performing 2D Residual U-Net was trained and validated against expert annotations. The algorithm for joint space width measurement based on TMJ segmentation was proposed, calculating the vertical distance between the superior-most point of the mandibular condyle and its corresponding point on the glenoid fossa.
RESULTS
The segmentation model achieved high performance for the mandibular condyle (Dice: 0.91 ± 0.08) and joint space (Dice: 0.86 ± 0.09), with notably lower performance for the glenoid fossa (Dice: 0.60 ± 0.24), highlighting variability due to its complex geometry. The TMJ space width measurement algorithm demonstrated minimal bias, with a mean difference of 0.08 mm and a mean absolute error of 0.18 mm compared to reference measurements.
CONCLUSIONS
The model exhibited potential as a reliable tool for clinical use, demonstrating accuracy in TMJ ultrasonographic analysis. This study underscores the ability of AI-driven segmentation and measurement algorithms to bridge existing gaps in ultrasonographic imaging and lays the foundation for broader clinical applications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.