Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024
The predictive power of conventional and novel obesity indices in identifying metabolic syndrome among the southern Iranian populations: findings from PERSIAN cohort study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rahimi Arash, Rafati Shideh, Azarbad Abnoos, Safa Hoda, Shahmoradi Mehdi, Asl Ali Salimi, Niazi Mahtab, Ahi Salma, Tabasi Shahrzad, Kheirandish Masoumeh
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) contributes to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Traditional metrics like body mass index (BMI) have limitations in discerning fat distribution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of traditional and novel anthropometric indices in metabolic syndrome and its components in the south coast of Iran.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 2694 adults aged 35 to 70 were included. Comprehensive anthropometric and biochemical data were collected and analyzed. There were eight anthropometric indices evaluated in this study, including a body shape index (ABSI), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-hip ratio (WHR), body roundness index (BRI), abdominal volume index (AVI), weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) and waist-height ratio (WHtR).
RESULTS: WHtR (AUC: 0.766 for males, 0.799 for females), BRI (AUC: 0.766 for males, 0.799 for females), and AVI (AUC: 0.769 for males, 0.793 for females) were the best predictors of MetS. ABSI had the weakest correlation with metabolic variables.
CONCLUSIONS: AVI, WHtR, BRI, and WHR were superior to other measures as anthropometric indexes for determining MetS and its components. The study contributes valuable insights into the utility of traditional and novel metrics in clinical practice, highlighting the need for standardized diagnostic approaches and further research in diverse populations.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 2694 adults aged 35 to 70 were included. Comprehensive anthropometric and biochemical data were collected and analyzed. There were eight anthropometric indices evaluated in this study, including a body shape index (ABSI), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-hip ratio (WHR), body roundness index (BRI), abdominal volume index (AVI), weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) and waist-height ratio (WHtR).
RESULTS: WHtR (AUC: 0.766 for males, 0.799 for females), BRI (AUC: 0.766 for males, 0.799 for females), and AVI (AUC: 0.769 for males, 0.793 for females) were the best predictors of MetS. ABSI had the weakest correlation with metabolic variables.
CONCLUSIONS: AVI, WHtR, BRI, and WHR were superior to other measures as anthropometric indexes for determining MetS and its components. The study contributes valuable insights into the utility of traditional and novel metrics in clinical practice, highlighting the need for standardized diagnostic approaches and further research in diverse populations.