m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
JACC. Heart failure · 2024

The Association of Echocardiographically Measured Donor Left Ventricular Mass and 1-Year Outcomes After Heart Transplantation.

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

O'Donnell Christian, Tapaskar Natalie, Sanchez Pablo A, Wayda Brian, Santana Everton J, Pulgrossi Rafael C, Steffner Kirsten, Zhang Shiqi, Weng Yingjie, Sun Louise Y, Malinoski Darren, Zaroff Jonathan, Haddad Francois, Khush Kiran K

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Donor-recipient heart size matching is crucial in heart transplantation; however, the often-used predicted heart mass (PHM) ratio may be inaccurate in the setting of obesity.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors sought to investigate the association between echocardiographically measured donor left ventricular mass (LVM) for heart size matching and the risk of the primary 1-year composite outcome of death or retransplantation.

METHODS: The Donor Heart Study was a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study that collected echocardiograms from brain-dead donors. The measured LVM ratio (donor measured LVM/recipient predicted LVM) was defined as the exposure variable, and the association with the primary outcome was analyzed with Cox proportional hazard modeling. Secondary analyses evaluated the association of the PHM and predicted LVM (donor predicted LVM/recipient predicted LVM) ratios with the primary outcome.

RESULTS: In 2,015 heart transplants, the measured LVM ratio demonstrated that undersized matches (<0.80) had a 47% higher risk (adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.01-2.15) and oversized (>1.20) matches had a 58% increased risk (aHR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.05-2.37) of the 1-year composite outcome compared with ideally matched transplants. However, the PHM and predicted LVM ratios were not associated with the primary outcome. Nonlinear modeling demonstrated a U-shaped relationship between the measured LVM ratio and composite outcome. The measured LVM ratio had superior predictive power for poor post-transplantation outcomes in obese recipients.

CONCLUSIONS: Measuring donor LVM with the use of echocardiography may provide a more accurate method for donor-recipient heart size matching that could improve heart transplant outcomes, especially in obese recipients.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты