Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2022
"What shall we focus on?" - A thematic analysis of what characterizes cognitive-behavior therapy sessions with high or low quality of working alliance.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ekeblad Annika, Dahlman Malene, Pio Malin, Malmquist Anna, Falkenström Fredrik
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Several studies have shown that the quality of the working alliance predicts symptomatic improvement session-by-session, including in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). We wanted to explore what characterizes CBT sessions with high and low alliances further using qualitative analysis.
METHOD: Ten CBT-sessions were selected from eight patients' therapies in a larger research project on psychotherapy for patients with major depression. Five sessions were chosen from high- and five from low-alliance sessions, based on therapist- and patient-reported Working Alliance Inventory scores. Transcripts of these sessions were analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The analysis yielded four themes, each structured into two sub-themes: Therapist style, Person in focus, Content focus, and Therapeutic direction. In contrast to low-alliance sessions, high-alliance sessions were characterized by a more exploring as opposed to expert therapist style; a focus on the patient's thoughts, feelings, and behavior, rather than a diffuse focus or a focus on other people's actions/external events; and a sense of moving forward rather than stagnation.
CONCLUSION: Our qualitative analysis showed theoretically and clinically meaningful processes in CBT sessions of high- vs low working alliance. This method is a useful complement to quantitative within-patient analyses, to expand on the meaning of quantitative findings.
METHOD: Ten CBT-sessions were selected from eight patients' therapies in a larger research project on psychotherapy for patients with major depression. Five sessions were chosen from high- and five from low-alliance sessions, based on therapist- and patient-reported Working Alliance Inventory scores. Transcripts of these sessions were analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The analysis yielded four themes, each structured into two sub-themes: Therapist style, Person in focus, Content focus, and Therapeutic direction. In contrast to low-alliance sessions, high-alliance sessions were characterized by a more exploring as opposed to expert therapist style; a focus on the patient's thoughts, feelings, and behavior, rather than a diffuse focus or a focus on other people's actions/external events; and a sense of moving forward rather than stagnation.
CONCLUSION: Our qualitative analysis showed theoretically and clinically meaningful processes in CBT sessions of high- vs low working alliance. This method is a useful complement to quantitative within-patient analyses, to expand on the meaning of quantitative findings.