Unsupervised Classification of Atrial Electrograms for Electroanatomic Mapping of Human Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Ablation treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF) remains challenging due to the absence of a 'ground truth' for atrial substrate characterization and the presence of multiple mechanisms driving the arrhythmia. We implemented an unsupervised classification to identify clusters of atrial electrograms (AEGs) with similar patterns, which were then validated by AEG-derived markers.
METHODS
956 bipolar AEGs were collected from 11 persAF patients. CARTO variables (Biosense Webster; ICL, ACI and SCI) were used to create a 3D space, and subsequently used to perform an unsupervised classification with k-means. The characteristics of the identified groups were investigated using nine AEG-derived markers: sample entropy (SampEn), dominant frequency, organization index (OI), determinism, laminarity, recurrence rate (RR), peak-to-peak (PP) amplitude, cycle length (CL), and wave similarity (WS).
RESULTS
Five AEG classes with distinct characteristics were identified (F = 582, P<0.0001). The presence of fractionation increased from class 1 to 5, as reflected by the nine markers. Class 1 (25%) included organized AEGs with high WS, determinism, laminarity, and RR, and low SampEn. Class 5 (20%) comprised fractionated AEGs with in low WS, OI, determinism, laminarity, and RR, and in high SampEn. Classes 2 (12%), 3 (13%) and 4 (30%) suggested different degrees of AEG organization.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results expand and reinterpret the criteria used for automated AEG classification. The nine markers highlighted electrophysiological differences among the five classes found by the k-means, which could provide a more complete characterization of persAF substrate during ablation target identification in future clinical studies.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.