Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2020
Characterizing Recurrence Following Hybrid Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kress David C, Erickson Lynn, Mengesha Tadele W, Krum David, Sra Jasbir
Аннотация
PURPOSE: It is widely accepted that atrial fibrillation (AF) accounts for half of arrhythmia recurrences following endocardial catheter ablation of AF. An epicardial-endocardial approach (hybrid) has emerged as an alternative to endocardial ablation alone for the treatment of AF, yet recurrence after a hybrid procedure has not been well characterized. This retrospective study is aimed at characterizing recurrence following hybrid ablation for patients with persistent AF.
METHODS: Patients with persistent AF (N=108) received both endocardial and epicardial ablation of the posterior left atrial wall using catheter ablation and a small midline surgical approach (hybrid). Presence of atrial flutter or AF was determined with ambulatory monitoring (n=22) or electrocardiogram analysis (n=86) at each follow-up visit. Recurrence mode was confirmed by electrophysiology study for those patients undergoing subsequent catheter ablation after hybrid ablation.
RESULTS: Patients were followed for a mean ± standard deviation of 25 ± 14 months. Of patients who had a recurrence, 53% (n=33) were in atrial flutter and 47% (n=29) were in AF. Of those who had a recurrence with atrial flutter, 14 received repeat ablation for either left (n=11) or left/right (n=3) atrial flutter and 3 received AF ablation. Half of ablations for atrial flutter recurrence following the hybrid procedure involved the mitral isthmus.
CONCLUSIONS: Atrial flutter accounts for about half of arrhythmia recurrences post-hybrid ablation. If catheter ablation of the mitral isthmus is considered during the hybrid procedure to prevent subsequent occurrence of perimitral flutter, bidirectional block must be performed to ensure a complete line of block.
METHODS: Patients with persistent AF (N=108) received both endocardial and epicardial ablation of the posterior left atrial wall using catheter ablation and a small midline surgical approach (hybrid). Presence of atrial flutter or AF was determined with ambulatory monitoring (n=22) or electrocardiogram analysis (n=86) at each follow-up visit. Recurrence mode was confirmed by electrophysiology study for those patients undergoing subsequent catheter ablation after hybrid ablation.
RESULTS: Patients were followed for a mean ± standard deviation of 25 ± 14 months. Of patients who had a recurrence, 53% (n=33) were in atrial flutter and 47% (n=29) were in AF. Of those who had a recurrence with atrial flutter, 14 received repeat ablation for either left (n=11) or left/right (n=3) atrial flutter and 3 received AF ablation. Half of ablations for atrial flutter recurrence following the hybrid procedure involved the mitral isthmus.
CONCLUSIONS: Atrial flutter accounts for about half of arrhythmia recurrences post-hybrid ablation. If catheter ablation of the mitral isthmus is considered during the hybrid procedure to prevent subsequent occurrence of perimitral flutter, bidirectional block must be performed to ensure a complete line of block.