International journal of cardiology · 2020
The value of extensive catheter linear ablation on persistent atrial fibrillation (the CLEAR-AF Study).
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yao Yan, Hu Feng, Du Zhongpeng, He Jiangui, Shi Haifeng, Zhang Jinlin, Cai Heng, Jia Yuhe, Tang Min, Niu Guodong, Chen Gang, Ding Ligang, Zheng Lihui, Liang Erpeng, Wu Lingmin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The ablation therapy for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) is still a challenge due to the high recurrence rate. This study was aimed to investigate the value of extensive linear ablation with contact force sensing techniques for PerAF.
METHODS: A total of 214 patients with PerAF were enrolled in five centers. The patients were randomly assigned to Group I (PVI + LA roof line+ LA anterior wall line) and Group II (PVI + LA roof line), mitral valve isthmus lines were added in both groups if the atrial fibrillation (AF) could not be terminated after all approaches above.
RESULTS: Acute success rate of AF termination during the ablation procedure in Group I was significantly higher than Group II (P = 0.028). Two-years follow-up showed no significant difference in the sinus rhythm maintenance rate between the two groups (63.4% in group I vs. 57.2% in group II, P = 0.218). More patients in Group I recurred as organized atrial tachycardia (AT) and can be precisely mapped during repeat ablation procedures (15 vs. 2, P = 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of AF/AT-free survival after repeat ablation procedures were 76.2% in Group I and 47.1% in Group II (P = 0.039).
CONCLUSIONS: Extensive linear ablation with contact force monitoring did not improve the long-term outcomes for PerAF patients. Repeat ablation procedure showed a possible higher chance of sinus rhythm restoration during follow-up.
METHODS: A total of 214 patients with PerAF were enrolled in five centers. The patients were randomly assigned to Group I (PVI + LA roof line+ LA anterior wall line) and Group II (PVI + LA roof line), mitral valve isthmus lines were added in both groups if the atrial fibrillation (AF) could not be terminated after all approaches above.
RESULTS: Acute success rate of AF termination during the ablation procedure in Group I was significantly higher than Group II (P = 0.028). Two-years follow-up showed no significant difference in the sinus rhythm maintenance rate between the two groups (63.4% in group I vs. 57.2% in group II, P = 0.218). More patients in Group I recurred as organized atrial tachycardia (AT) and can be precisely mapped during repeat ablation procedures (15 vs. 2, P = 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of AF/AT-free survival after repeat ablation procedures were 76.2% in Group I and 47.1% in Group II (P = 0.039).
CONCLUSIONS: Extensive linear ablation with contact force monitoring did not improve the long-term outcomes for PerAF patients. Repeat ablation procedure showed a possible higher chance of sinus rhythm restoration during follow-up.