Transplantation proceedings · 2009
A systematic review of two different trimetoprim-sulfamethoxazole regimens used to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii and no prophylaxis at all in transplant recipients: appraising the evidence.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Di Cocco P, Orlando G, Bonanni L, D'Angelo M, Clemente K, Greco S, Gravante G, Madeddu F, Scelzo C, Famulari A, Pisani F
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to clarify the potential advantages of a low-dose regimen of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in transplant recipients (80/400 mg/d every day or 160/800 mg/d every other day) with those obtained from the full-dose prophylaxis (160/800 mg/d every day) or no prophylaxis.
METHODS: Prospectively randomized and retrospectively case controlled studies were selected.
RESULTS: Four studies matched the inclusion criteria-2 randomized and 2 case controls-for a total of 570 patients. The pneumonia incidence was 0% after full-dose prophylaxis (0/181), 1% after the low-dose regimen (1/105), and 11% with no prophylaxis (31/284). Pneumonia occurrences were significant lower between the full-dose prophylaxis versus the no prophylaxis group (0% vs 11%; P < .001), and between the low-dose and no prophylaxis groups (1% vs 11%; P < .001). There was no difference between patients receiving the full-dose prophylaxis versus the low-dose regimen (0% vs 1%; P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: The low-dose gives similar results as the full-dose regimen for the prevention of PJP and seems a feasible, safe option for transplanted patients.
METHODS: Prospectively randomized and retrospectively case controlled studies were selected.
RESULTS: Four studies matched the inclusion criteria-2 randomized and 2 case controls-for a total of 570 patients. The pneumonia incidence was 0% after full-dose prophylaxis (0/181), 1% after the low-dose regimen (1/105), and 11% with no prophylaxis (31/284). Pneumonia occurrences were significant lower between the full-dose prophylaxis versus the no prophylaxis group (0% vs 11%; P < .001), and between the low-dose and no prophylaxis groups (1% vs 11%; P < .001). There was no difference between patients receiving the full-dose prophylaxis versus the low-dose regimen (0% vs 1%; P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: The low-dose gives similar results as the full-dose regimen for the prevention of PJP and seems a feasible, safe option for transplanted patients.