Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice · 2024
Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in treating diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dalmedico Michel Marcos, do Rocio Fedalto Angela, Martins Waleska Alves, de Carvalho Chayane Karla Lucena, Fernandes Beatriz Luci, Ioshii Sergio Ossamu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) present devastating complications. Management of these wounds includes applying a vacuum device composed of a fenestrated tube embedded in a foam dressing and connected to a vacuum pump to collect the fluid in a vessel.
OBJECTIVE: To review the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in treating DFUs and evaluate the clinical outcomes of full and partial wound healing.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted after searching the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies that described the use of NPWT in the management of DFUs were included and compared with different interventions for the proposed outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were included, 1 of which was later excluded during internal validation. Wound healing outcomes were analyzed in 2 studies, showing the superiority of total wound healing in the NPWT group. Ten studies compared the effect of different interventions on wound area reduction and 8 of these results were best with NPWT. Three studies showed clinical and statistical homogeneity (I² = 100%), making it possible to conduct a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION: Although the articles included in this systematic review have limitations regarding methodological quality and clinical heterogeneity, the results showed the potential benefit of NPWT in healing and wound area reduction. These outcomes are essential in the prevention of amputation in patients with DFU.
OBJECTIVE: To review the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in treating DFUs and evaluate the clinical outcomes of full and partial wound healing.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted after searching the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies that described the use of NPWT in the management of DFUs were included and compared with different interventions for the proposed outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were included, 1 of which was later excluded during internal validation. Wound healing outcomes were analyzed in 2 studies, showing the superiority of total wound healing in the NPWT group. Ten studies compared the effect of different interventions on wound area reduction and 8 of these results were best with NPWT. Three studies showed clinical and statistical homogeneity (I² = 100%), making it possible to conduct a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION: Although the articles included in this systematic review have limitations regarding methodological quality and clinical heterogeneity, the results showed the potential benefit of NPWT in healing and wound area reduction. These outcomes are essential in the prevention of amputation in patients with DFU.