Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2017
External quality assessment for laboratory testing of HLA-B*15:02 allele in relation to carbamazepine therapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lin Guigao, Zhang Kuo, Han Yanxi, Xie Jiehong, Li Jinming
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Due to the significant risk of developing Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), the use of carbamazepine is not recommended in patients carrying the human leukocyte antigen B (HLA-B) *15:02 allele. In an effort to guarantee reliable community-based HLA-B*15:02 testing throughout China, a HLA-B*15:02 genotyping external quality assessment (EQA) program was set up.
METHODS: In 2016, 10 genomic DNA samples with known HLA-B*15:02 allele status were sent to 37 laboratories from 16 provinces with a request for routine HLA-B*15:02 screening. The samples were validated using Sanger sequencing by a reference laboratory. Both genotyping results and clinical written reports were evaluated.
RESULTS: Thirty-six of the participating laboratories correctly identified the HLA-B*15:02 allele status for all EQA samples. However, one lab failed to identify any positive challenges. The overall analytical sensitivity was 97.3% (180/185 challenges; 95% confidence interval: 93.8%-99.1%) and the analytic specificity was 100% (185/185; 95% confidence interval: 98.0%-100%). A review of the written reports showed that the clinical reporting for HLA-B*15:02 detection should be improved. Some essential information was missing, most notably laboratory information/contact, therapeutic recommendations, and methodology.
CONCLUSION: External quality assessment is valuable in assessing and improving the quality of laboratory testing of HLA-B*15:02 allele.
METHODS: In 2016, 10 genomic DNA samples with known HLA-B*15:02 allele status were sent to 37 laboratories from 16 provinces with a request for routine HLA-B*15:02 screening. The samples were validated using Sanger sequencing by a reference laboratory. Both genotyping results and clinical written reports were evaluated.
RESULTS: Thirty-six of the participating laboratories correctly identified the HLA-B*15:02 allele status for all EQA samples. However, one lab failed to identify any positive challenges. The overall analytical sensitivity was 97.3% (180/185 challenges; 95% confidence interval: 93.8%-99.1%) and the analytic specificity was 100% (185/185; 95% confidence interval: 98.0%-100%). A review of the written reports showed that the clinical reporting for HLA-B*15:02 detection should be improved. Some essential information was missing, most notably laboratory information/contact, therapeutic recommendations, and methodology.
CONCLUSION: External quality assessment is valuable in assessing and improving the quality of laboratory testing of HLA-B*15:02 allele.