MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00038-010-0155-2

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of public health · 2010

Factors associated with condom use among young adult ecstasy users.

Elifson Kirk W, Klein Hugh, Sterk Claire E

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This paper examines the prevalence of and the factors associated with condom use in a sample of 283 young adult ecstasy users.

METHODS

The study, which relied upon targeted sampling and ethnographic mapping, took place between 2002 and 2004. It entailed conducting two-hour-long, face-to-face interviews in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area.

RESULTS

Condom use was inconsistent; only 35.2% of all sex acts were protected. Using multiple regression, five factors were related to condom use: race (Caucasians used condoms less than other groups), income (lower income = greater condom use), relationship status (persons involved in relationships reported less condom use than those who were not "involved"), multiple sex partners (multiple sex partners = more condom use), and condom use self-efficacy (higher efficacy level = more condom use).

CONCLUSIONS

Condom use rates were not optimal in this population. In particular, targeted interventions are needed for Caucasian ecstasy users. Intervention efforts ought to address relationship (in)fidelity as it pertains to engaging in safer sex practices, especially among persons involved in relationships. Intervention efforts also need to work to increase condom use self-efficacy.

Для цитирования: Elifson Kirk W, Klein Hugh, Sterk Claire E. Factors associated with condom use among young adult ecstasy users.. International journal of public health. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-010-0155-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.