Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2026
Three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking for assessment of left ventricular myocardial fibrosis in patients with end-stage heart failure.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gao Lang, Xie Mingxing, Zhang Li, Cao Yukun, Wang Jing, Zhu Peng, Zhang Yanting, Lin Yixia, Ji Mengmeng, He Qing, Wu Zhenni, Qin Shuxuan, Dong Nianguo, Li Yuman
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) have been reported to correlate with the extent of left ventricular myocardial fibrosis (LVMF), but the value of 3D-STE in predicting LVMF compared with CMR-FT has not been investigated in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF).
METHODS: A total of 155 patients who underwent CMR, two-dimensional (2D), and 3D echocardiographic examinations before heart transplantation were enrolled. Left ventricular global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were obtained from CMR-FT, 3D-STE, and 2D-STE. The degree of LVMF was quantified using Masson's trichrome staining in left ventricular myocardial samples from the explanted hearts, and patients were divided into three groups according to tertiles of histologic LVMF.
RESULTS: 3D-GLS, 2D-GLS, CMR-GLS, and CMR-GCS were lower in patients with severe LVMF than in those with mild and moderate LVMF. LVMF was strongly correlated with CMR-GLS and 3D-GLS (r = 0.74, 0.73, respectively; both P < 0.001), and moderately correlated with 2D-GLS (r = 0.63, P < 0.001). CMR-GLS and 3D-GLS demonstrated similar diagnostic performance in identifying severe LVMF (area under the curve: 0.88 vs. 0.86, P > 0.05). The model with CMR-GLS (R2 = 0.550, P < 0.001) had a similar predictive value for the degree of LVMF as the model with 3D-GLS (R2 = 0.528, P < 0.001), and outperformed the model with 2D-GLS (R2 = 0.383, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Both CMR-GLS and 3D-GLS are strongly correlated with LVMF, and are promising non-invasive imaging parameters for the assessment of LVMF in patients with end-stage HF.
METHODS: A total of 155 patients who underwent CMR, two-dimensional (2D), and 3D echocardiographic examinations before heart transplantation were enrolled. Left ventricular global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were obtained from CMR-FT, 3D-STE, and 2D-STE. The degree of LVMF was quantified using Masson's trichrome staining in left ventricular myocardial samples from the explanted hearts, and patients were divided into three groups according to tertiles of histologic LVMF.
RESULTS: 3D-GLS, 2D-GLS, CMR-GLS, and CMR-GCS were lower in patients with severe LVMF than in those with mild and moderate LVMF. LVMF was strongly correlated with CMR-GLS and 3D-GLS (r = 0.74, 0.73, respectively; both P < 0.001), and moderately correlated with 2D-GLS (r = 0.63, P < 0.001). CMR-GLS and 3D-GLS demonstrated similar diagnostic performance in identifying severe LVMF (area under the curve: 0.88 vs. 0.86, P > 0.05). The model with CMR-GLS (R2 = 0.550, P < 0.001) had a similar predictive value for the degree of LVMF as the model with 3D-GLS (R2 = 0.528, P < 0.001), and outperformed the model with 2D-GLS (R2 = 0.383, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Both CMR-GLS and 3D-GLS are strongly correlated with LVMF, and are promising non-invasive imaging parameters for the assessment of LVMF in patients with end-stage HF.