Clinical practice guidelines for reporting nailfold videocapillaroscopy: a Delphi consensus on behalf of the Italian Society of Rheumatology Study Group on Capillaroscopy.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ingegnoli Francesca, Pireddu Debora, Platania Elena, De Angelis Rossella, Alunno Alessia, Ariani Alarico, Barsotti Simone, Batani Veronica, Belloli Laura, Bezzi Alessandra, Bosello Silvia Laura, Cacciapaglia Fabio, Calvisi Stefania Laura, Carlo-Stella Nicoletta, Carubbi Francesco, Cavazzana Ilaria, Codullo Veronica, Colaci Michele, Cornalba Martina, Cuomo Giovanna, De Marchi Ginevra, Della Rossa Alessandra, Di Battista Marco, Di Ruscio Evy, Faggioli Paola, Favero Marta, Foti Roberta, Girelli Francesco, Giuggioli Dilia, Guiducci Serena, Gotelli Emanuele, Grosso Vittorio, Hysa Elvis, Iuliano Annamaria, Lalli Francesca, Leveghi Lorenzo, Marasco Emiliano, Mennillo Gianna, Moroncini Gianluca, Pellegrino Greta, Perricone Carlo, Pizzorni Carmen, Praino Emanuela, Quarta Laura, Ramoni Véronique Laure, Santo Leonardo, Schenone Carlotta, Sebastiani Marco, Serafino Lucia, Serban Teodora, Stobbione Paolo, Sulli Alberto, Truglia Simona, Smith Vanessa, Cutolo Maurizio, Riccieri Valeria, Study Group on Capillaroscopy and Microcirculation in Rheumatic Diseases of the Italian Society of Rheumatology (CAPSIR)
Аннотация
METHODS: A web-based Delphi consensus study was conducted among members of the Study Group on Capillaroscopy and Microcirculation in Rheumatic Diseases of the Italian Society of Rheumatology (CAPSIR). The study was based on items derived from a previous systematic review and international consensus by the EULAR Study Group on Microcirculation in Rheumatic Diseases (SG_MC/RD).
RESULTS: A total of 40 items were proposed during the Delphi process, which was completed by 52 participants from different Italian regions. An agreement was reached on 23 items covering different aspects of the NVC examination: general aspects (2 items), description of the fingers examined (3 items), possible confounding factors (2 items), device description (2 items), image quality (1 item) and details of the NVC examination (13 items). Sixteen of these were considered mandatory for inclusion in the NVC practice report, and 7 were considered optional.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed NVC checklist covers 23 relevant issues in clinical practice, including 16 mandatory items grouped into five categories. This national consensus will improve the reproducibility and generalisability of NVC reporting in daily clinical practice. Furthermore, the outcomes of this NVC consensus process will inform the next European web-based Delphi consensus study, to be conducted among the member countries of the EULAR SG_MC/RD.