La Revue de medecine interne · 2001
[Surgical decompression treatment of leprous neuritis at the Bom-Pastor Hospital (Brazilian Amazonia)].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Debray M, Hanslik T, Avansi M A, Pabion B, Lortholary O
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Only leprosy resource centres undertake surgery for neuritis. Patients' accessibility to this surgical procedure is poor because these centres are often far from their homes. The aim of our work is to study the feasibility of neuritis surgery in the field.
METHODS: A surgeon trained in this surgery was recruited by Bom-Pastor hospital in Brazilian Amazonia, which is located 400 km away from the leprosy resource centre. Patients operated from May 1996 to December 1997 were enrolled in this retrospective study.
RESULTS: A total of 45 operations were carried out during 17 procedures on 13 patients, among which 12 were multibacillary cases. The decompression surgery was performed with a median delay of 1 year after leprosy diagnosis and 3.5 months after the neuritis diagnosis. Among 17 operations, 14 were performed for painful neuritis of recent onset unsuccessfully treated with corticoids or recurring during the month after corticoids were withdrawn. The other three operations were performed for long-standing neuritis with paralysis and deformity. Pain was relieved in all the cases of recent neuritis, except for one patient who suffered from a serious steroid-dependant erythema nodosum leprosum. An improvement of motor function was observed in one out of three patients with long-standing neuritis. Adverse effects were few: a scar infection with a rapid recovery and a keloid scar. Two neurites recurred 2 and 10 months after the surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: In an endemic leprosy region, field access to surgery for neuritis appears to prove real progress in the management of leprosy neuritis.
METHODS: A surgeon trained in this surgery was recruited by Bom-Pastor hospital in Brazilian Amazonia, which is located 400 km away from the leprosy resource centre. Patients operated from May 1996 to December 1997 were enrolled in this retrospective study.
RESULTS: A total of 45 operations were carried out during 17 procedures on 13 patients, among which 12 were multibacillary cases. The decompression surgery was performed with a median delay of 1 year after leprosy diagnosis and 3.5 months after the neuritis diagnosis. Among 17 operations, 14 were performed for painful neuritis of recent onset unsuccessfully treated with corticoids or recurring during the month after corticoids were withdrawn. The other three operations were performed for long-standing neuritis with paralysis and deformity. Pain was relieved in all the cases of recent neuritis, except for one patient who suffered from a serious steroid-dependant erythema nodosum leprosum. An improvement of motor function was observed in one out of three patients with long-standing neuritis. Adverse effects were few: a scar infection with a rapid recovery and a keloid scar. Two neurites recurred 2 and 10 months after the surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: In an endemic leprosy region, field access to surgery for neuritis appears to prove real progress in the management of leprosy neuritis.