DOI 10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.07.002
In the Eye of Controversy: A Deeper Look Into the Impact of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Diabetic Retinopathy and Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.
Аннотация
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs), a relatively new class of drugs, are used widely in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. Maintaining long-term glycemic management lowers the risk of development and progression of diabetic retinopathy. However, recent literature has raised concerns about transient worsening of the condition with use of GLP1-RAs. In this review we evaluate the association between GLP1-RAs and retinopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. We also analyzed the available evidence on the potential association between semaglutide therapy and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). Our review consists of relevant publications, including meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and post hoc analyses, and outcomes of in vitro and in vivo research. The article search was conducted using several databases, including the WorldCat Discovery service provided by the Al Maktoum Medical Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Preclinical studies hint at possible protective effects on the retina, but a more complex picture is presented by clinical evidence. Although there have been cases of retinopathy development after GLP1-RA use, this may be due to a swift reduction in glycated hemoglobin levels rather than the drug's mechanism of action itself. Evidence linking semaglutide to NAION remains inconclusive and limited by methodological constraints. Large-scale studies with robust design are warranted to elucidate the potential association and to guide clinical practice.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.