American journal of clinical pathology · 2023
Sensitivity and specificity of thromboelastography for hyperfibrinolysis: Comparison of TEG 5000 and TEG 6S CK LY30 systems.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fuja Christine, Carll Timothy C, Mikrut Krzysztof, Wool Geoffrey D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The sensitivity and specificity of clot lysis at 30 minutes after maximum clot strength (LY30), as measured by thromboelastography (TEG), for clinically significant hyperfibrinolysis have not been compared across the 2 US Food and Drug Administration-approved instruments (the TEG 5000 and TEG 6s [Haemonetics]).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of these 2 instruments using the kaolin (CK) reagent.
RESULTS: Local verification studies showed that the TEG 5000 and TEG 6s CK LY30 upper limits of normal (ULNs) were distinct (5.0% and 3.2%, respectively). Retrospective analysis of patient data showed that abnormal LY30 was 6 times more prevalent with the TEG 6s than with the TEG 5000 instrument. LY30 was a significant predictor of mortality with both instruments (TEG 6s: receiver operating characteristic [ROC] area under the curve [AUC] = 0.836, P ≤ .0001; TEG 5000: ROC AUC = 0.779, P = .028). The optimal LY30 cut point was determined based on these mortality data for each instrument. The TEG 6s showed superior mortality prediction than the TEG 5000 at lower LY30 levels (≥10%), with likelihood ratios of 8.22 and 2.62 for the TEG 6s and TEG 5000, respectively. Patients with a TEG 6s CK LY30 of 10% or higher were significantly more likely to die, receive cryoprecipitate, receive transfusions, or receive massive transfusion than patients with a TEG 6s LY30 of 3.3% to 9.9% (all P < .01). Patients with a TEG 5000 LY30 of 17.1% or higher were significantly more likely to die or use cryoprecipitate (P < .05); transfusion and massive transfusion protocol were not significantly different. Whole blood spiking studies showed that 70 ng/mL tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) achieved an average LY30 of approximately 10% for both instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: CK LY30 above the ULN is a sensitive but not specific cutoff for hyperfibrinolysis. At least moderately elevated CK LY30 carries more clinical portent on the TEG 6s instrument than on the TEG 5000. These TEG instruments are not sensitive to low concentrations of tPA.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of these 2 instruments using the kaolin (CK) reagent.
RESULTS: Local verification studies showed that the TEG 5000 and TEG 6s CK LY30 upper limits of normal (ULNs) were distinct (5.0% and 3.2%, respectively). Retrospective analysis of patient data showed that abnormal LY30 was 6 times more prevalent with the TEG 6s than with the TEG 5000 instrument. LY30 was a significant predictor of mortality with both instruments (TEG 6s: receiver operating characteristic [ROC] area under the curve [AUC] = 0.836, P ≤ .0001; TEG 5000: ROC AUC = 0.779, P = .028). The optimal LY30 cut point was determined based on these mortality data for each instrument. The TEG 6s showed superior mortality prediction than the TEG 5000 at lower LY30 levels (≥10%), with likelihood ratios of 8.22 and 2.62 for the TEG 6s and TEG 5000, respectively. Patients with a TEG 6s CK LY30 of 10% or higher were significantly more likely to die, receive cryoprecipitate, receive transfusions, or receive massive transfusion than patients with a TEG 6s LY30 of 3.3% to 9.9% (all P < .01). Patients with a TEG 5000 LY30 of 17.1% or higher were significantly more likely to die or use cryoprecipitate (P < .05); transfusion and massive transfusion protocol were not significantly different. Whole blood spiking studies showed that 70 ng/mL tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) achieved an average LY30 of approximately 10% for both instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: CK LY30 above the ULN is a sensitive but not specific cutoff for hyperfibrinolysis. At least moderately elevated CK LY30 carries more clinical portent on the TEG 6s instrument than on the TEG 5000. These TEG instruments are not sensitive to low concentrations of tPA.