Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
MPL gene mutation is a possible risk factor for thrombosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia in Japan.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Furuya Chiho, Hashimoto Yoshinori, Morishita Soji, Inano Tadaaki, Ochiai Tomonori, Shirane Shuichi, Edahiro Yoko, Araki Marito, Ando Miki, Komatsu Norio
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Since MPL mutation is a rare driver gene mutation found in a small number of essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients, the clinical characteristics of patients with MPL mutations and their association with thrombotic events have not yet been elucidated in Japan.
METHODS: We enrolled 579 Japanese ET patients based on the diagnostic criteria of the WHO classification 2017 and compared clinical characteristics of MPL-mutated patients (n = 22; 3.8%) to JAK2V617F-mutated (n = 299; 51.6%), CALR-mutated (n = 144; 24.9%), and triple-negative (TN) (n = 114; 19.7%) patients.
RESULTS: Thrombosis during follow up was observed in 4 out of 22 (18.2%) in the MPL-mutated group, which was the highest among all driver gene mutation groups (JAK2V617F-mutated, 8.7%; CALR-mutated, 3.5%; TN,1.8%). The MPL- and JAK2V617F-mutated groups had worse thrombosis-free survival (TFS) than the CALR-mutated (p = 0.043) and TN groups (p = 0.006). Univariable analysis revealed that a history of thrombosis was a possible risk factor for thrombosis among MPL-mutated patients (hazard ratio: 9.572, p = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: MPL-mutated ET patients should require more intensive management to prevent recurrence of thrombosis.
METHODS: We enrolled 579 Japanese ET patients based on the diagnostic criteria of the WHO classification 2017 and compared clinical characteristics of MPL-mutated patients (n = 22; 3.8%) to JAK2V617F-mutated (n = 299; 51.6%), CALR-mutated (n = 144; 24.9%), and triple-negative (TN) (n = 114; 19.7%) patients.
RESULTS: Thrombosis during follow up was observed in 4 out of 22 (18.2%) in the MPL-mutated group, which was the highest among all driver gene mutation groups (JAK2V617F-mutated, 8.7%; CALR-mutated, 3.5%; TN,1.8%). The MPL- and JAK2V617F-mutated groups had worse thrombosis-free survival (TFS) than the CALR-mutated (p = 0.043) and TN groups (p = 0.006). Univariable analysis revealed that a history of thrombosis was a possible risk factor for thrombosis among MPL-mutated patients (hazard ratio: 9.572, p = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: MPL-mutated ET patients should require more intensive management to prevent recurrence of thrombosis.