MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.04.006

Медицинская библиотека · Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2023

Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET.

Guo Jian-Ying, Lin Hong-Yuan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The Sepsis Coagulopathy Asahi Recombinant LE Thrombomodulin (SCARLET) trial has many defects, and thus cannot be the terminator of recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM). On the contrary, it provides sufficient evidence for further research. Based on analysis focusing on the failure of SCARLET and several previous anticoagulant studies, it is most important for new studies to grasp the following two points: (1) The enrolled cases should have sufficient disease severity and a clear standard for disseminated intravascular coagulation; (2) Heparin should not be used in combination with the investigated drugs. Multiple post-hoc analyses show that no combination of heparin will not increase the risk of thromboembolism. In fact, the combination of heparin can mask the true efficacy of the investigated drug. Due to the complexity of sepsis treatment and the limitations of clinical studies, the results of all treatment studies should be repeatedly verified, rather than be determined at one stroke. Some research conclusions contrary to disease physiology, pharmacology and clinical practice may be deceptive, and should be cautious rather than be simply accepted. On the other hand, the dissenting voices in the "consensus" scene are often well discussed by the authors and should be highly valued.

Для цитирования: Guo Jian-Ying, Lin Hong-Yuan. Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET.. Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.04.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.