Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation With Follitropin Delta and Follitropin Alfa: A Retrospective Study.

AIM: This study compared the cost-effectiveness of two recombinant follicle-stimulating hormones (rFSH) formulations, Follitropin Delta and Follitropin Alfa, in controlled ovarian stimulation using cumulative live birth rates as an efficacy indicator.

METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study was conducted across five clinics in Japan from April 2022 to December 2023, involving 446 first assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles (200 with Follitropin Delta and 246 with Follitropin Alfa) were treated with rFSH monotherapy using either Follitropin Delta or Follitropin Alfa. We compared clinical outcomes such as cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates and analyzed cost-effectiveness using the cumulative live birth rates as the efficacy indicator and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

The Follitropin Delta group had a significantly lower incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (15.90% vs. 27.00%, P = 0.045) and higher cumulative pregnancy rates than the Follitropin Alfa group (87.30% vs. 76.20 %; P = 0.03) after propensity score matching (PSM). Although cumulative live birth rates showed no significant differences (85.70% vs. 76.20%, P = 0.08) and Follitropin Delta demonstrated higher cost than Follitropin AlfaFollitropin Alfa (832,036 yen and 826,936 yen), ICER indicated low costs per percentage of live births (538.58 yen/%: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 275.34-12,568.69 yen).

CONCLUSIONS

Using Follitropin Delta for controlled ovarian stimulation in ART may be more cost-effective than Follitropin Alfa under Japan's Health Care Insurance System, offering higher cumulative live birth rates and minimal additional costs.