Genes · 2026
The CTLA-4 Pathway in Human Disease: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targeting.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Negrini Simone, Nicola Stefania, Badiu Iuliana, Quinternetto Anna, Vitali Ilaria, Sardo Luca Lo, Brussino Luisa
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: CTLA-4 is a key checkpoint of peripheral immune regulation, yet its biology cannot be reduced to inhibitory signaling alone. This review discusses CTLA-4 as a dynamic regulatory pathway shaped by ligand handling, intracellular trafficking, recycling, and cell-type-specific function, and examines how these features link molecular mechanism to human disease and therapy.
METHODS: We synthesized the structural, mechanistic, translational, and clinical literature spanning CTLA-4 molecular biology, cell-type-specific function, inborn errors of immunity, polygenic autoimmunity, transplantation, cancer immunotherapy, and immune-related adverse events.
RESULTS: CTLA-4 function depends on surface availability, trans-endocytosis of CD80/CD86, and tight control of endosomal trafficking. These features help explain why CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency, LRBA deficiency, and DEF6 deficiency converge clinically despite different upstream lesions, and why subtler CTLA-4 variation contributes to polygenic autoimmunity. Therapeutic studies also provide mechanistic insight. Abatacept can partly replace pathway function in monogenic disease, whereas belatacept highlights the limits of ligand blockade when endogenous coinhibition is also lost. In oncology, anti-CTLA-4 antibodies act through a more complex interplay involving checkpoint blockade, Fc biology, intratumoral Treg depletion, and receptor recycling. Emerging next-generation agents aim to retain antitumor activity while reducing systemic toxicity through more selective use of these mechanisms.
CONCLUSIONS: Rather than a static inhibitory receptor, CTLA-4 is better viewed as a context-dependent regulatory pathway whose function depends on trafficking, surface availability, and cellular context. This perspective links molecular mechanism to clinical phenotype and supports more precise CTLA-4-targeted therapy.
METHODS: We synthesized the structural, mechanistic, translational, and clinical literature spanning CTLA-4 molecular biology, cell-type-specific function, inborn errors of immunity, polygenic autoimmunity, transplantation, cancer immunotherapy, and immune-related adverse events.
RESULTS: CTLA-4 function depends on surface availability, trans-endocytosis of CD80/CD86, and tight control of endosomal trafficking. These features help explain why CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency, LRBA deficiency, and DEF6 deficiency converge clinically despite different upstream lesions, and why subtler CTLA-4 variation contributes to polygenic autoimmunity. Therapeutic studies also provide mechanistic insight. Abatacept can partly replace pathway function in monogenic disease, whereas belatacept highlights the limits of ligand blockade when endogenous coinhibition is also lost. In oncology, anti-CTLA-4 antibodies act through a more complex interplay involving checkpoint blockade, Fc biology, intratumoral Treg depletion, and receptor recycling. Emerging next-generation agents aim to retain antitumor activity while reducing systemic toxicity through more selective use of these mechanisms.
CONCLUSIONS: Rather than a static inhibitory receptor, CTLA-4 is better viewed as a context-dependent regulatory pathway whose function depends on trafficking, surface availability, and cellular context. This perspective links molecular mechanism to clinical phenotype and supports more precise CTLA-4-targeted therapy.