Danish medical journal · 2020
Translation and linguistic validation of the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) into Danish.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gissel Tina N, Hvass Mikkel, Fly Jette, Børsting Kristine, Birring Surinder S, Spinou Arietta, Weinreich Ulla Møller
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Patients with bronchiectasis suffer from breathlessness, cough and sputum production, which impairs quality of life. The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ), a short and disease-specific questionnaire, has previously been developed and validated in English. The aim of this study was to translate and validate the BHQ in Danish, using established cross-cultural validation methods.
METHODS: To create a Danish version of the questionnaire, this study used linguistic validation, a pilot study in 17 patients and forward-backward translation. Thereafter, 111 patients with bronchiectasis were asked to complete the BHQ (BHQ1) as well as the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and one in three patients were asked to repeat the BHQ after two weeks had passed (BHQ2).
RESULTS: There was a significant convergent validity between the BHQ1 and the SGRQ (ρ = -0,826, p = 0.0001), a satisfactory correlation coefficient between the BHQ1 and the BHQ2 (0.739) and a lower limit of agreement of -15.96 and 20.56 in the Bland Altmann plot.
CONCLUSIONS: The BHQ is translated and validated in Danish and retains good validity properties. This questionnaire is ready for use in daily clinical practice among Danish-speaking patients.
FUNDING: none.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
METHODS: To create a Danish version of the questionnaire, this study used linguistic validation, a pilot study in 17 patients and forward-backward translation. Thereafter, 111 patients with bronchiectasis were asked to complete the BHQ (BHQ1) as well as the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and one in three patients were asked to repeat the BHQ after two weeks had passed (BHQ2).
RESULTS: There was a significant convergent validity between the BHQ1 and the SGRQ (ρ = -0,826, p = 0.0001), a satisfactory correlation coefficient between the BHQ1 and the BHQ2 (0.739) and a lower limit of agreement of -15.96 and 20.56 in the Bland Altmann plot.
CONCLUSIONS: The BHQ is translated and validated in Danish and retains good validity properties. This questionnaire is ready for use in daily clinical practice among Danish-speaking patients.
FUNDING: none.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.