The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2007
Randomized controlled safety and efficacy trial of 2 vitamin A supplementation schedules in Tanzanian infants.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Idindili Boniphace, Masanja Honarati, Urassa Honorathy, Bunini Wilbert, van Jaarsveld Paul, Aponte John J, Kahigwa Elizeus, Mshinda Hassan, Ross David, Schellenberg David M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Vitamin A supplementation reduces morbidity and mortality in children living in areas endemic for vitamin A deficiency. Routine vitamin A supplementation usually starts only at age 9 mo, but high rates of illness and mortality are seen in the first months of life.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vitamin A supplementation at the same time as routine vaccination in infants aged 1-3 mo.
DESIGN: We recruited 780 newborn infants and their mothers to a randomized double-blind controlled trial in Ifakara in southern Tanzania. In one group, mothers received 60,000 microg vitamin A palmitate shortly after delivery, and their infants received 7500 microg at the same time as vaccinations given at approximately 1, 2, and 3 mo of age. In the other group, mothers received a second 60,000-microg dose when their infant was aged 1 mo, and their infants received 15,000 microg at the same time as the routine vaccinations. VAD was defined as a modified relative dose-response test result of >or=0.060.
RESULTS: High-dose vitamin A supplementation was well tolerated. The relative risk of VAD at 6 mo in the high-dose group compared with the lower dose group was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.09; P=0.32). Serum retinol and incidence of illness did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Some vitamin A capsules degraded toward the end of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Doubling the doses of vitamin A to mothers and their young infants is safe but unlikely to reduce short-term morbidity or to substantially enhance the biochemical vitamin A status of infants at age 6 mo. The stability of vitamin A capsules merits further investigation.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vitamin A supplementation at the same time as routine vaccination in infants aged 1-3 mo.
DESIGN: We recruited 780 newborn infants and their mothers to a randomized double-blind controlled trial in Ifakara in southern Tanzania. In one group, mothers received 60,000 microg vitamin A palmitate shortly after delivery, and their infants received 7500 microg at the same time as vaccinations given at approximately 1, 2, and 3 mo of age. In the other group, mothers received a second 60,000-microg dose when their infant was aged 1 mo, and their infants received 15,000 microg at the same time as the routine vaccinations. VAD was defined as a modified relative dose-response test result of >or=0.060.
RESULTS: High-dose vitamin A supplementation was well tolerated. The relative risk of VAD at 6 mo in the high-dose group compared with the lower dose group was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.09; P=0.32). Serum retinol and incidence of illness did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Some vitamin A capsules degraded toward the end of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Doubling the doses of vitamin A to mothers and their young infants is safe but unlikely to reduce short-term morbidity or to substantially enhance the biochemical vitamin A status of infants at age 6 mo. The stability of vitamin A capsules merits further investigation.