Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2021
Postoperative Radiotherapy for Completely Resected Masaoka/Masaoka-Koga Stage II/III Thymoma Improves Overall Survival: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 4746 Patients.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tateishi Yudai, Horita Nobuyuki, Namkoong Ho, Enomoto Tatsuji, Takeda Atsuya, Kaneko Takeshi
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on completely resected Masaoka/Masaoka-Koga (M/MK) stage II/III thymomas.
METHODS: We systematically searched four online databases and included studies that compared surgery alone versus surgery plus a PORT for completely resected M/MK stage II/III thymoma. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were evaluated as the primary and secondary end points, respectively. We performed a subgroup analysis for OS with respect to M/MK stage II, III, and inseparable II/III cases. A generic inverse variance meta-analysis using a random model was conducted.
RESULTS: Five studies including 4746 patients (among them, 2408 patients received PORT) met our selection criteria. A meta-analysis of these five studies revealed that PORT was associated with a significantly better OS (HR = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.83, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.97). Subgroup analyses for M/MK stage II disease (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.91, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.80) and M/MK stage III disease (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.95, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.84) revealed similar results. PORT was not associated with an improved disease-free survival (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.70-1.33, p = 0.83, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.72).
CONCLUSIONS: Currently available evidence from observational studies suggests PORT for patients with completely resected M/MK stage II/III thymoma. A randomized trial is warranted.
METHODS: We systematically searched four online databases and included studies that compared surgery alone versus surgery plus a PORT for completely resected M/MK stage II/III thymoma. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were evaluated as the primary and secondary end points, respectively. We performed a subgroup analysis for OS with respect to M/MK stage II, III, and inseparable II/III cases. A generic inverse variance meta-analysis using a random model was conducted.
RESULTS: Five studies including 4746 patients (among them, 2408 patients received PORT) met our selection criteria. A meta-analysis of these five studies revealed that PORT was associated with a significantly better OS (HR = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.83, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.97). Subgroup analyses for M/MK stage II disease (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.91, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.80) and M/MK stage III disease (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.95, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.84) revealed similar results. PORT was not associated with an improved disease-free survival (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.70-1.33, p = 0.83, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.72).
CONCLUSIONS: Currently available evidence from observational studies suggests PORT for patients with completely resected M/MK stage II/III thymoma. A randomized trial is warranted.