Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
Stepwise response-guided treatment protocol superior to thrombopoietin receptor agonist-based second-line therapy for severe persistent/chronic immune thrombocytopenia: a multicenter prospective study from China.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fu Lingling, Lin Xi, Chen Zhenping, Wang Zhifa, Liu Yan, Wang Lijuan, Hu Yu, Ma Jingyao, Wang Nan, Cheng Xiaoling, Ma Jie, Wu Runhui
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The first second-line international recommendation for children with severe persistent/chronic immune thrombocytopenia is thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA)-based treatment; however, <30% can achieve sustained response off-treatment (SRoT), leading to a heavy medical burden.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to confirm the efficacy of the stepwise response-guided treatment protocol compared with TPO-RA-based second-line therapy for children with severe P/CITP.
METHODS: The stepwise response-guided treatment protocol is an individualized stratified immune thrombocytopenia treatment starting with high-dose dexamethasone, then adding rituximab and TPO-RAs in sequential order according to treatment response. A prospective, multicenter clinical cohort study enrolled severe P/CITP children with a 1-year follow-up. We compared the treatment outcome response of platelet count, bleeding control, and treatment-related side effects and cost outcomes (escalation status, SRoT, and treatment costs) between the stepwise group and the TPO-RA-based second-line treatment group (TPO-RA group).
RESULTS: The study enrolled 143 cases of severe P/CITP children with a 12-month follow-up period. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the stepwise and TPO-RA groups (P > .05). Response/remission rates and bleeding grades showed no differences (P > .05), but there were fewer side effects related to treatment in the stepwise group (9.0%; P < .00). A total of 74% in the stepwise group achieved SRoT while none in the TPO-RA group did. The cost of treatment was significantly lower in the stepwise group compared with the TPO-RA group over the 12-month follow-up period (USD 68.26/kg vs USD 384.76/kg, P < .00).
CONCLUSION: The stepwise response-guided treatment protocol effectively stratifies children with severe P/CITP based on treatment response, enabling individualized treatment strategies. This protocol achieves comparable efficacy and safety while reducing the treatment burden compared with TPO-RA-based second-line therapy, making it a preferable option for children with severe P/CITP.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to confirm the efficacy of the stepwise response-guided treatment protocol compared with TPO-RA-based second-line therapy for children with severe P/CITP.
METHODS: The stepwise response-guided treatment protocol is an individualized stratified immune thrombocytopenia treatment starting with high-dose dexamethasone, then adding rituximab and TPO-RAs in sequential order according to treatment response. A prospective, multicenter clinical cohort study enrolled severe P/CITP children with a 1-year follow-up. We compared the treatment outcome response of platelet count, bleeding control, and treatment-related side effects and cost outcomes (escalation status, SRoT, and treatment costs) between the stepwise group and the TPO-RA-based second-line treatment group (TPO-RA group).
RESULTS: The study enrolled 143 cases of severe P/CITP children with a 12-month follow-up period. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the stepwise and TPO-RA groups (P > .05). Response/remission rates and bleeding grades showed no differences (P > .05), but there were fewer side effects related to treatment in the stepwise group (9.0%; P < .00). A total of 74% in the stepwise group achieved SRoT while none in the TPO-RA group did. The cost of treatment was significantly lower in the stepwise group compared with the TPO-RA group over the 12-month follow-up period (USD 68.26/kg vs USD 384.76/kg, P < .00).
CONCLUSION: The stepwise response-guided treatment protocol effectively stratifies children with severe P/CITP based on treatment response, enabling individualized treatment strategies. This protocol achieves comparable efficacy and safety while reducing the treatment burden compared with TPO-RA-based second-line therapy, making it a preferable option for children with severe P/CITP.