European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
Safety and efficacy of re-treatment with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-Octreotate radionuclide therapy in progressive gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours - a single centre experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kashyap Raghava, Alipour Ramin, Boehm Emma, Jewell Kerry, RaviKumar Aravind S, Cardin Anthony, Saghebi Javad, Hofman Michael S, Fahey Michael T, Michael Michael, Akhurst Tim, Hicks Rodney J, Kong Grace
Аннотация
AIM: Patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NET) who retain somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression after initial response to [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-Octreotate (LuTate) peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are amenable to re-treatment (R-PRRT) upon progression. We assessed the safety and efficacy of R-PRRT in patients with progressive metastatic GEP NET.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis, approved by institutional ethics board, was performed in patients with GEP NET who received R-PRRT for either symptomatically or radiologically progressive disease. Safety was assessed by renal and haematological parameters at 3 months post R-PRRT (CTCAE v5.0). Molecular imaging response was evaluated on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Octreotate (GaTate) PET/CT using pre-defined criteria. RECIST 1.1 responses 3 months post R-PRRT were documented when feasible. Progression-free and overall survival analysis were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 63 patients had R1-PRRT (1-3 cycles). The majority (70%) had Grade 2 NET and small intestinal primary (51%). A second re-treatment course (R2-PRRT) was given in 20 patients and a third course (R3-PRRT) in 6 patients. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was stable following R1-PRRT. Following R2-PRRT, worsening GFR from CTCAE G2 to G3 was seen in 10% (2/20) of patients, but none after R3-PRRT. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2 patients after R1-PRRT and in 1 patient after R3-PRRT. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 1 patient post R1-PRRT. Following R1-PRRT, RECIST 1.1 responses CR, PR, SD was 0%, 10%, 76%, respectively. Disease control rate on GaTate PET/CT was 52/58 (89%) post R1-PRRT. Median progression free survival (PFS) following R1-PRRT was 1.6 years (95% CI:1.2-2.3).
CONCLUSION: R-PRRT is feasible, tolerable and efficacious in achieving disease control in patients with progressive GEP NET.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis, approved by institutional ethics board, was performed in patients with GEP NET who received R-PRRT for either symptomatically or radiologically progressive disease. Safety was assessed by renal and haematological parameters at 3 months post R-PRRT (CTCAE v5.0). Molecular imaging response was evaluated on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Octreotate (GaTate) PET/CT using pre-defined criteria. RECIST 1.1 responses 3 months post R-PRRT were documented when feasible. Progression-free and overall survival analysis were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 63 patients had R1-PRRT (1-3 cycles). The majority (70%) had Grade 2 NET and small intestinal primary (51%). A second re-treatment course (R2-PRRT) was given in 20 patients and a third course (R3-PRRT) in 6 patients. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was stable following R1-PRRT. Following R2-PRRT, worsening GFR from CTCAE G2 to G3 was seen in 10% (2/20) of patients, but none after R3-PRRT. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2 patients after R1-PRRT and in 1 patient after R3-PRRT. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 1 patient post R1-PRRT. Following R1-PRRT, RECIST 1.1 responses CR, PR, SD was 0%, 10%, 76%, respectively. Disease control rate on GaTate PET/CT was 52/58 (89%) post R1-PRRT. Median progression free survival (PFS) following R1-PRRT was 1.6 years (95% CI:1.2-2.3).
CONCLUSION: R-PRRT is feasible, tolerable and efficacious in achieving disease control in patients with progressive GEP NET.