European journal of ophthalmology · 2023
Fundus autofluorescence of retinal atrophy progression between fundus flavimaculatus and extensive macular atrophy with pseudo-drusen.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rabinovich Mark, Mehanna Carl-Joe, Lopez Juan Manuel, Souied Eric H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the progression of macular atrophy in Fundus Flavimaculatus (FFM) versus Extensive Macular Atrophy with Pseudo-drusen (EMAP), using Spectralis® RegionFinder™ tool.
METHODS: Retrospective review of patients diagnosed with FFM and EMAP. Ophthalmic imaging features were reviewed by retina specialists for each patient in both eyes. The atrophic zones were measured on fundus autofluorescence acquisitions using the RegionFinder™ tool.
RESULTS: FFM group included 16 eyes of 8 patients, whose mean age was 61.42 ± 10.76 years, with a mean 4.54 ± 2.73 years of follow-up. EMAP group contained 16 eyes of 8 patients, whose mean age was 67.81 ± 3.03 years (p = 0.12), with a mean 3.62 ± 2.49 years of follow-up (P = 0.63). The atrophy progression rates were 3.73 ± 6.75 and 0.70 ± 0.98 mm2/year, for EMAP and FFM respectively. The yearly rate of progression of the atrophic areas in EMAP was 5.3 times higher than in FFM (mm2/year) (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: The progression of the atrophy in eyes with Extensive Macular Atrophy with Pseudo-drusen (EMAP) is significantly more rapid than in eyes with Fundus Flavimaculatus (FFM).
METHODS: Retrospective review of patients diagnosed with FFM and EMAP. Ophthalmic imaging features were reviewed by retina specialists for each patient in both eyes. The atrophic zones were measured on fundus autofluorescence acquisitions using the RegionFinder™ tool.
RESULTS: FFM group included 16 eyes of 8 patients, whose mean age was 61.42 ± 10.76 years, with a mean 4.54 ± 2.73 years of follow-up. EMAP group contained 16 eyes of 8 patients, whose mean age was 67.81 ± 3.03 years (p = 0.12), with a mean 3.62 ± 2.49 years of follow-up (P = 0.63). The atrophy progression rates were 3.73 ± 6.75 and 0.70 ± 0.98 mm2/year, for EMAP and FFM respectively. The yearly rate of progression of the atrophic areas in EMAP was 5.3 times higher than in FFM (mm2/year) (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: The progression of the atrophy in eyes with Extensive Macular Atrophy with Pseudo-drusen (EMAP) is significantly more rapid than in eyes with Fundus Flavimaculatus (FFM).