Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2018
Long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with a contralateral carotid artery occlusion.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cotter Ryan, Kokkinidis Damianos G, Choy Ho-Hin, Singh Gagan D, Rogers R Kevin, Waldo Stephen W, Laird John R, Armstrong Ehrin J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between a contralateral carotid artery occlusion (CCO) and the rates of subsequent target-lesion restenosis and revascularization after carotid artery stenting (CAS).
BACKGROUND: Patients with carotid artery disease undergoing revascularization often have a CCO. The association of a CCO with long-term outcomes after CAS is uncertain.
METHODS: At two institutions, 267 CAS procedures were performed from 2006 to 2016 including 47 (18%) with a CCO. Regular follow-up with duplex carotid ultrasound was performed to assess for restenosis. Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the presence of a CCO and repeat revascularization.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 70 years. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in procedural indication (asymptomatic vs ischemic symptoms) or medical comorbidities between groups. During 5-year follow up, the rate of duplex-derived >80% stenosis was 6% in the non-CCO group and 9% in the CCO group (P = 0.45). Despite similar rates of >80% restenosis, there was a significant association between CCO and subsequent target-lesion revascularization (TLR), with rates of 6.4% vs 0.9% at 5 years (HR 7.2, confidence interval (CI) 1.2-43, P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between groups in the 5-year rates of stroke (4.3% in CCO group vs 4.5% in non-CCO group, HR 0.53, CI 0.07-4.22, P = 1.0) or MACCE (15% vs 18%, HR 0.55, CI 0.2-1.55, P = 0.68).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing CAS with a CCO were more likely to undergo TLR during long-term follow up, but they did not have any differences in procedural success or short- and long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Patients with carotid artery disease undergoing revascularization often have a CCO. The association of a CCO with long-term outcomes after CAS is uncertain.
METHODS: At two institutions, 267 CAS procedures were performed from 2006 to 2016 including 47 (18%) with a CCO. Regular follow-up with duplex carotid ultrasound was performed to assess for restenosis. Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the presence of a CCO and repeat revascularization.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 70 years. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in procedural indication (asymptomatic vs ischemic symptoms) or medical comorbidities between groups. During 5-year follow up, the rate of duplex-derived >80% stenosis was 6% in the non-CCO group and 9% in the CCO group (P = 0.45). Despite similar rates of >80% restenosis, there was a significant association between CCO and subsequent target-lesion revascularization (TLR), with rates of 6.4% vs 0.9% at 5 years (HR 7.2, confidence interval (CI) 1.2-43, P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between groups in the 5-year rates of stroke (4.3% in CCO group vs 4.5% in non-CCO group, HR 0.53, CI 0.07-4.22, P = 1.0) or MACCE (15% vs 18%, HR 0.55, CI 0.2-1.55, P = 0.68).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing CAS with a CCO were more likely to undergo TLR during long-term follow up, but they did not have any differences in procedural success or short- and long-term outcomes.