EClinicalMedicine · 2025
Safety of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate delivered by HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a phase 3, multi-site, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, active-comparator study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Usmani Omar S, Martinez Fernando J, Pandya Hitesh, Camiolo Matthew, Bednarczyk Artur, Kucz Kinga, Kokot Marek, Gottfridsson Christer, Aurivillius Magnus, Pettersson Lars, Mei Jie, Skansen Karin, Bell Jennifer L, Petullo David, Collison Kathryn, Bondarov Patrik, Jassal Mandeep, Patel Mehul
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) contain a hydrofluorocarbon propellant, such as hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-134a), which is known to have global warming potential (GWP). Transitioning pMDIs to propellants with lower GWP will reduce the environmental impact of pMDIs. This study assessed the safety of a near-zero GWP propellant, hydrofluoroolefin-1234ze (HFO-1234ze), compared with HFA-134a when used in the delivery of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) in participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The results of this study advance our understanding of the safety of HFO-1234ze compared with HFA-134a.
METHODS: This phase 3, double-blind, parallel-group study (ClinicalTrials.govNCT05573464) across 9 countries (Argentina, Bulgaria, Canada, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States) included participants (aged 40-80 years) with physician-diagnosed COPD using dual or triple inhaled maintenance therapies, COPD Assessment Test score ≥10, ≥10 pack-years smoking history, and no comorbid diagnosis of asthma or other clinically significant diseases impacting study outcomes. Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive either BGF HFO-1234ze or BGF HFA-134a (two inhalations of 160/7·2/5·0 μg twice daily) for 12 weeks in the main safety analysis set (or 52 weeks [first 120 participants per treatment]). Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), measures of vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms.
FINDINGS: Participants were recruited between 27 September 2022 and 19 May 2023. A total of 874 participants were screened. Of 558 treated participants (mean [standard deviation] age, 67·0 [7·4] years; male, 315 [56·5%]) in the 12-week safety analysis set, 280 received BGF HFO-1234ze, and 278 received BGF HFA-134a. The AE incidence was balanced between formulations in the 12-week (HFO-1234ze, 124 [44·3%]; HFA-134a, 114 [41·0%]) and 52-week (HFO-1234ze, 80 [66·7%]; HFA-134a, 94 [78·3%]) safety analysis sets.
INTERPRETATION: These findings support the potential for HFO-1234ze to replace HFA-134a in pMDIs containing BGF, which could be evaluated further in a real-world setting.
FUNDING: The study was supported by AstraZeneca.
METHODS: This phase 3, double-blind, parallel-group study (ClinicalTrials.govNCT05573464) across 9 countries (Argentina, Bulgaria, Canada, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States) included participants (aged 40-80 years) with physician-diagnosed COPD using dual or triple inhaled maintenance therapies, COPD Assessment Test score ≥10, ≥10 pack-years smoking history, and no comorbid diagnosis of asthma or other clinically significant diseases impacting study outcomes. Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive either BGF HFO-1234ze or BGF HFA-134a (two inhalations of 160/7·2/5·0 μg twice daily) for 12 weeks in the main safety analysis set (or 52 weeks [first 120 participants per treatment]). Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), measures of vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms.
FINDINGS: Participants were recruited between 27 September 2022 and 19 May 2023. A total of 874 participants were screened. Of 558 treated participants (mean [standard deviation] age, 67·0 [7·4] years; male, 315 [56·5%]) in the 12-week safety analysis set, 280 received BGF HFO-1234ze, and 278 received BGF HFA-134a. The AE incidence was balanced between formulations in the 12-week (HFO-1234ze, 124 [44·3%]; HFA-134a, 114 [41·0%]) and 52-week (HFO-1234ze, 80 [66·7%]; HFA-134a, 94 [78·3%]) safety analysis sets.
INTERPRETATION: These findings support the potential for HFO-1234ze to replace HFA-134a in pMDIs containing BGF, which could be evaluated further in a real-world setting.
FUNDING: The study was supported by AstraZeneca.