Journal of cardiology · 2017
Different indicators for postprocedural mitral stenosis caused by single- or multiple-clip implantation after percutaneous mitral valve repair.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Itabashi Yuji, Utsunomiya Hiroto, Kubo Shunsuke, Mizutani Yukiko, Mihara Hirotsugu, Murata Mitsushige, Siegel Robert J, Kar Saibal, Fukuda Keiichi, Shiota Takahiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Postprocedural mitral stenosis (MS) is a main limitation for MitraClip™ (Abbot Vascular, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) procedure. The purpose of this study was to detect the preprocedural predictors of high transmitral pressure gradient (TMPG) after MitraClip™ implantation, which indicated postprocedural mitral stenosis (MS).
METHODS: We studied 79 patients who were implanted with MitraClip™ in our institute. Before the procedure, mitral valve orifice area (MVOA), and anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) mitral annular diameters were measured at diastole using three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) data set. After the procedure, the mean TMPG was assessed using continuous-wave (CW) Doppler by periprocedural TEE.
RESULTS: Preprocedural MVOA, and AP and ML diameter of left ventricular (LV) inflow orifices were larger in patients with mean TMPG ≤4mmHg than in patients with TMPG >4mmHg after 1-and 2-clip implantation. The large MVOA and ML diameter of LV inflow orifice strongly correlated with the low TMPG after 1- and 2-clip implantation. As a result of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the preprocedural MVOA predicted the low postprocedural TMPG more accurately than the ML diameter of LV inflow orifice after 1-clip implantation either in the degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation (MR) patients. After 2-clip implantation, however, the preprocedural ML diameter of LV inflow orifice predicted it more accurately than the MVOA in the degenerative and functional MR patients.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D TEE derived MVOA predicts the postprocedural MS after 1-clip implantation, however, preprocedural ML diameter of LV inflow orifice is more useful to predict after 2-clip implantation.
METHODS: We studied 79 patients who were implanted with MitraClip™ in our institute. Before the procedure, mitral valve orifice area (MVOA), and anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) mitral annular diameters were measured at diastole using three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) data set. After the procedure, the mean TMPG was assessed using continuous-wave (CW) Doppler by periprocedural TEE.
RESULTS: Preprocedural MVOA, and AP and ML diameter of left ventricular (LV) inflow orifices were larger in patients with mean TMPG ≤4mmHg than in patients with TMPG >4mmHg after 1-and 2-clip implantation. The large MVOA and ML diameter of LV inflow orifice strongly correlated with the low TMPG after 1- and 2-clip implantation. As a result of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the preprocedural MVOA predicted the low postprocedural TMPG more accurately than the ML diameter of LV inflow orifice after 1-clip implantation either in the degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation (MR) patients. After 2-clip implantation, however, the preprocedural ML diameter of LV inflow orifice predicted it more accurately than the MVOA in the degenerative and functional MR patients.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D TEE derived MVOA predicts the postprocedural MS after 1-clip implantation, however, preprocedural ML diameter of LV inflow orifice is more useful to predict after 2-clip implantation.