Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2019
Predictive Model for Infection Risk in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Patients Treated With Azacitidine; Azacitidine Infection Risk Model: The Polish Adult Leukemia Group Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mądry Krzysztof, Lis Karol, Biecek Przemysław, Młynarczyk Magda, Rytel Jagoda, Górka Michał, Kacprzyk Piotr, Dutka Magdalena, Rodzaj Marek, Bołkun Łukasz, Krochmalczyk Dorota, Łątka Ewa, Drozd-Sokołowska Joanna, Waszczuk-Gajda Anna, Knopińska-Posłuszny Wanda, Kopińska Anna, Subocz Edyta, Masternak Anna, Guzicka-Kazimierczak Renata, Gil Lidia, Machowicz Rafał, Biliński Jarosław, Giebel Sebastian, Czerw Tomasz, Dwilewicz-Trojaczek Jadwiga
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, including those treated with azacitidine, are at increased risk for serious infections. The aim of our study was to identify patients with higher infectious risk at the beginning of azacitidine treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of 298 MDS/CMML/AML patients and included in the analysis 232 patients who completed the first 3 cycles of azacitidine therapy or developed Grade III/IV infection before completing the third cycle.
RESULTS: Overall, 143 patients (62%) experienced serious infection, and in 94 patients (41%) infection occurred within the first 3 cycles. The following variables were found to have the most significant effect on the infectious risk in multivariate analysis: red blood cell transfusion dependency (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-4.79), neutropenia <0.8 × 109/L (OR, 3.03; 97.5% CI, 1.66-5.55), platelet count <50 × 109/L (OR, 2.63; 97.5% CI, 1.42-4.76), albumin level <35 g/dL (OR, 2.04; 97.5% CI, 1.01-4.16), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 (OR, 2.19; 97.5% CI, 1.40-3.54). Each of these variables is assigned 1 point, and the combined score represents the proposed Azacitidine Infection Risk Model. The infection rate in the first 3 cycles of therapy in lower-risk (0-2 score) and higher-risk (3-5 score) patients was 25% and 73%, respectively. The overall survival was significantly reduced in higher-risk patients compared with the lower-risk cohort (8 vs. 29 months).
CONCLUSION: We selected a subset with high early risk for serious infection and worse clinical outcome among patients treated with azacitidine.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of 298 MDS/CMML/AML patients and included in the analysis 232 patients who completed the first 3 cycles of azacitidine therapy or developed Grade III/IV infection before completing the third cycle.
RESULTS: Overall, 143 patients (62%) experienced serious infection, and in 94 patients (41%) infection occurred within the first 3 cycles. The following variables were found to have the most significant effect on the infectious risk in multivariate analysis: red blood cell transfusion dependency (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-4.79), neutropenia <0.8 × 109/L (OR, 3.03; 97.5% CI, 1.66-5.55), platelet count <50 × 109/L (OR, 2.63; 97.5% CI, 1.42-4.76), albumin level <35 g/dL (OR, 2.04; 97.5% CI, 1.01-4.16), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 (OR, 2.19; 97.5% CI, 1.40-3.54). Each of these variables is assigned 1 point, and the combined score represents the proposed Azacitidine Infection Risk Model. The infection rate in the first 3 cycles of therapy in lower-risk (0-2 score) and higher-risk (3-5 score) patients was 25% and 73%, respectively. The overall survival was significantly reduced in higher-risk patients compared with the lower-risk cohort (8 vs. 29 months).
CONCLUSION: We selected a subset with high early risk for serious infection and worse clinical outcome among patients treated with azacitidine.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisAntifungal AgentsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAzacitidineBacterial InfectionsFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLeukemia, Myelomonocytic, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedMycosesMyelodysplastic SyndromesPolandProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTreatment Outcome