Pediatric pulmonology · 2024
Respiratory function testing for guiding ventilator mode conversion in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kimura Sasagu, Toyoshima Katsuaki, Shimokaze Tomoyuki, Katsumata Kaoru, Saito Tomoko, Hoshino Rikuo
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: For patients with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia, conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) are used in initial ventilatory management. HFOV has recently been recommended as a rescue therapy; however, we use HFOV for initial ventilation management, with a preoperative challenge test for CMV conversion and respiratory function testing at the time of CMV conversion. We aimed to compare patient characteristics between CMV conversion- and HFOV-preferred treatment groups.
METHODS: Ventilator settings and blood gases were retrospectively evaluated pre- and post-CMV conversion, and respiratory function tests for compliance of the respiratory system (Crs) and for resistance of the respiratory system (Rrs) were performed during the trial to CMV conversion.
RESULTS: No differences were observed between the CMV conversion- and HFOV-preferred groups regarding gestational age, birth weight, and observed/expected lung area-to-head circumference ratios. The median Crs (ml/cmH2 O/kg) and Rrs (cmH2 O･kg/L/s) in the CMV conversion- and HFOV-preferred groups was 0.42 versus 0.53 (p = .44) and 467 versus 327 (p = .045), respectively. The pre and posttrial amount of change in blood gas levels and ventilator parameters in the CMV conversion- and HFOV-preferred groups were as follows: mean airway pressure, -2.0 versus 0 cmH2 O; partial pressure of carbon dioxide, 6.1 versus 2.9 Torr; alveolar-arterial oxygen difference, -39.5 versus -50 Torr; and oxygenation index, -1.0 versus -0.6; respectively.
CONCLUSION: Respiratory function tests were useful in tailoring ventilator settings. Patients with high Rrs values responded better to CMV conversion.
METHODS: Ventilator settings and blood gases were retrospectively evaluated pre- and post-CMV conversion, and respiratory function tests for compliance of the respiratory system (Crs) and for resistance of the respiratory system (Rrs) were performed during the trial to CMV conversion.
RESULTS: No differences were observed between the CMV conversion- and HFOV-preferred groups regarding gestational age, birth weight, and observed/expected lung area-to-head circumference ratios. The median Crs (ml/cmH2 O/kg) and Rrs (cmH2 O･kg/L/s) in the CMV conversion- and HFOV-preferred groups was 0.42 versus 0.53 (p = .44) and 467 versus 327 (p = .045), respectively. The pre and posttrial amount of change in blood gas levels and ventilator parameters in the CMV conversion- and HFOV-preferred groups were as follows: mean airway pressure, -2.0 versus 0 cmH2 O; partial pressure of carbon dioxide, 6.1 versus 2.9 Torr; alveolar-arterial oxygen difference, -39.5 versus -50 Torr; and oxygenation index, -1.0 versus -0.6; respectively.
CONCLUSION: Respiratory function tests were useful in tailoring ventilator settings. Patients with high Rrs values responded better to CMV conversion.