Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for the Provision of a District-Wide Diabetes Retinal Screening Service.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Artificial intelligence (AI) enhanced retinal screening could reduce the impact of diabetic retinopathy (DR), the leading cause of preventable blindness in Australia. This study assessed the performance and validity of a dual-modality, deep learning system for detection of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (vtDR) in a multi-ethnic community.
METHODS
Cross-sectional (algorithm-validation) study with the deep learning system assessing fundus photographs for gradability and severity of DR, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans for diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Internal validation of each algorithm was performed using a computer-randomised 80:20 split. External validation was by comparison to standard grading provided by two ophthalmologists in 748 prospectively recruited persons with diabetes (age ≥ 10) from hospital diabetes clinics and a general practice. Main outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS
Internal validation revealed robust test characteristics. When compared to ophthalmologists, the system achieved an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94) for fundus photograph gradeability, 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.94) for the diagnosis of severe non-proliferative DR/proliferative DR and 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.96) for DMO detection from OCT scans. It demonstrated real-world applicability with an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97), sensitivity of 92.7% and specificity of 95.5% for detection of vtDR. Ungradable images occurred in 55 participants (7.4%).
CONCLUSIONS
The dual-modality, deep learning system can diagnose vtDR from fundus photographs and OCT scans with high levels of accuracy and specificity. This could support a novel model of care for DR screening in our community.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.