MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1227/01.neu.0000279738.15307.37

Медицинская библиотека · Neurosurgery · 2007

Cerebral myiasis associated with angiosarcoma of the scalp: case report.

Cheshier Samuel H, Bababeygy Simon R, Higgins Dominique, Parsonnet Julie, Huhn Stephen L

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Primary human cerebral myiasis is an exceedingly rare condition and is almost never encountered by physicians in developed countries. The case report summarizes a case of extensive cerebral myiasis in a periurban community in the United States.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION: After a minor motor vehicle accident, police brought a 75-year-old man to the emergency room because he was observed to have a large cranial lesion. Examination revealed a 15 x 17 cm frontal bone defect with eroded frontal dura, exposed cortex, and massive cortical maggot infestation.

INTERVENTION: The patient was empirically treated with intravenous antibiotics for meningitis. Maggots (Phaenicia sericata, or the green bottle fly) were removed by suction, attrition, and gentle contact exposure to a mild bleach solution. Biopsy of the scalp and cranium revealed angiosarcoma, for which operative treatment was refused. The patient was transferred to a skilled nursing facility for palliative care where he died 3 months later.

CONCLUSION

This is the first published case of cerebral myiasis in the United States. Although human cerebral myiasis is rare, conditions do exist in this country that permit myiasis.

Для цитирования: Cheshier Samuel H, Bababeygy Simon R, Higgins Dominique, Parsonnet Julie, Huhn Stephen L. Cerebral myiasis associated with angiosarcoma of the scalp: case report.. Neurosurgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000279738.15307.37.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.