JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2016
Cardiac CT With Delayed Enhancement in the Characterization of Ventricular Tachycardia Structural Substrate: Relationship Between CT-Segmented Scar and Electro-Anatomic Mapping.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Esposito Antonio, Palmisano Anna, Antunes Sofia, Maccabelli Giuseppe, Colantoni Caterina, Rancoita Paola Maria Vittoria, Baratto Francesca, Di Serio Clelia, Rizzo Giovanna, De Cobelli Francesco, Della Bella Paolo, Del Maschio Alessandro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare myocardial scars depicted by computed tomography (CT) with electrical features from electro-anatomic mapping (EAM), assessing the potential role of CT integration in ventricular tachycardia (VT) and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) procedures.
BACKGROUND: Imaging-based characterization of VT myocardial substrate is required to plan EAM and, potentially, to guide RFCA.
METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients, 35 of whom had implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, all referred for VT RFCA, underwent pre-procedural CT including an angiographic and a 10-min delayed-enhancement scan. Segmental comparison between scars segmented from CT and low voltages (bipolar voltages <1.5 mV; unipolar voltages <8 mV), late potentials, and RF ablation points on EAM, was carried out. In a subset of 16 consecutive patients, a further point-by-point analysis was performed: a CT-derived 3-dimensional structure including heart anatomy and myocardial scars was integrated with EAM for quantitative comparison.
RESULTS: CT scans identified scars in 39 patients and defined left ventricular wall involvement and mural distribution. Overall segmental concordance between CT and EAM was good (κ = 0.536) despite the presence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, scar etiologies, and mural distribution. CT identified segments characterized by low voltages with good sensitivity (76%), good specificity (86%), and very high negative predictive value (95%). Late potentials and RF ablation points fell on scarred segments identified from CT in 79% and 81% of cases, respectively. Point-by-point quantitative comparison revealed good correlation between the average area of scar detected at CT and at bipolar mapping (CT = 4,901 mm(2), bipolar voltages-EAM = 4,070 mm(2); R = 0.78; p < 0.0001). In this study, 70% and 84% of low-amplitude bipolar points were mapped at a maximum distance of 5 mm and 10 mm from CT-segmented scar, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CT with delayed-enhancement provides a 3-dimensional characterization of VT scar substrate together with a detailed anatomic model of the heart. This information may offer assistance to plan EAM and RFCA procedures and is potentially suitable for EAM-imaging integration.
BACKGROUND: Imaging-based characterization of VT myocardial substrate is required to plan EAM and, potentially, to guide RFCA.
METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients, 35 of whom had implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, all referred for VT RFCA, underwent pre-procedural CT including an angiographic and a 10-min delayed-enhancement scan. Segmental comparison between scars segmented from CT and low voltages (bipolar voltages <1.5 mV; unipolar voltages <8 mV), late potentials, and RF ablation points on EAM, was carried out. In a subset of 16 consecutive patients, a further point-by-point analysis was performed: a CT-derived 3-dimensional structure including heart anatomy and myocardial scars was integrated with EAM for quantitative comparison.
RESULTS: CT scans identified scars in 39 patients and defined left ventricular wall involvement and mural distribution. Overall segmental concordance between CT and EAM was good (κ = 0.536) despite the presence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, scar etiologies, and mural distribution. CT identified segments characterized by low voltages with good sensitivity (76%), good specificity (86%), and very high negative predictive value (95%). Late potentials and RF ablation points fell on scarred segments identified from CT in 79% and 81% of cases, respectively. Point-by-point quantitative comparison revealed good correlation between the average area of scar detected at CT and at bipolar mapping (CT = 4,901 mm(2), bipolar voltages-EAM = 4,070 mm(2); R = 0.78; p < 0.0001). In this study, 70% and 84% of low-amplitude bipolar points were mapped at a maximum distance of 5 mm and 10 mm from CT-segmented scar, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CT with delayed-enhancement provides a 3-dimensional characterization of VT scar substrate together with a detailed anatomic model of the heart. This information may offer assistance to plan EAM and RFCA procedures and is potentially suitable for EAM-imaging integration.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Action PotentialsAgedCardiomyopathiesCatheter AblationCicatrixComputed Tomography AngiographyContrast MediaDefibrillators, ImplantableElectric CountershockElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacFemaleHeart RateHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyMyocardiumPredictive Value of TestsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTachycardia, Ventricular